A lot to digest. I’ll try to read some of the older posts as you are correct... we tend to only read forward.
The contract issue is a interesting one. I think I got a copy of the un-redacted version of the Pfizer contract the EU commission signed from a link posted on Twitter around 18 months ago. So it is in the public domain somewhat. I mean I’m nobody, I didn’t dig particularly hard and I have it... go figure.
So it’s interesting that some MEP’s were calling for the release of the uncensored version (the original is essentially a modern art masterpiece of permanent marker blacking out all the pertinent bits) whilst I had already read through it and determined it to be quite the horror show.
So it left me scratching my head. If a Joe Soap like me can get my hands on it surely they can? So what gives? I haven’t followed the situation too closely but it seems the contract issue has dropped from sight. Was it ever discussed again in the EU parliament?
Maybe what I downloaded was fake? But I did check the redacted version (the bits you could read) and it seemed to align with what was in it.
So the information is out there, no one, i.e. investigative journalists, MEP’s, etc. seems to want to discuss it anymore.
Is it a lack of will, a legal issue, are they bought and paid for, etc.? Or did I miss something? Was it all a fever dream on my part?
Answers on a postcard to the usual address please...
You make interesting points re contracts, politicians and knowledge.
VST can tell you for certain that it is pointless to assume anything about a politician's knowledge, skill, interests, ability, care or agenda, irrespective of what they say in public. The only metric of a politician is what you can find out about what they do. Nothing else matters.
One factor is time. There's literally no way a politician can represent the interests of their constituents on time and ratio basis. This is why you have to find ways to force their awareness of an issue then pressure them endlessly in any way you can imagine until they act, and often they never will (due agenda and other factors). The entirety of the British House of Commons is corrupt and controlled by multiple layers of fear inducing systems from money, the Party system, the intelligence services and worse. This is documented fact and Andrew Bridgen literally states this on camera.
This is why VST has put out the letters and asked readers to engage, in order to get on to the radar of some politicians, while simultaneously testing the will and engagement of our readers. Guess what we found? Your guess will be right.
Andrew Bridgen acknowledged receipt of our recent letter, asked for us to maintain direct contact with him on his parliamentary email then went quiet. He has the information from us that we think he needs and he knows that McKernan et al are involved in genetic analysis. It is now for him to act visibly in parliament in light of what we and others have given him. Not enough seen yet. He could be doing a hell of al lot more. He should be going up against the MHRA and the NHS leadership for gross negligence manslaughter.
We also sent the same information to some Euro MEPs and heard zero back from them. No doubt, we should try again. They could be going up against the EMA and nation health systems like Bridgen could. You could build revolutions around those challenges if you were a skilled politician.
Now, regarding contracts, Cristian Terhes et al (incl Christine Anderson) were the ones who held up the redacted Euro contract and called out Von Der Leyen re her secret and corrupt Pfizer deals. Why they didn't get sent by others incl @ehdenbiber the unredacted contracts to hold up, I don't know. Maybe they did.
Look at Rob Roos. Asks decent questions in occasional fora, but where's the endless onslaught against the system? See what is happening in the Aussie parliament now via Gerrard Rennick and Alex Antic. The reason why those Aussie MPs are able to do what they are doing is because behind them are several citizens constantly feeding them information and telling them what to understand, how to understand it and what they can challenge and do. They aren't operating independently. They're being massively helped and briefed by people who spent ages building that relationship with them, and they are all three years late. Those challenges should have happened up front, globally, before anyone took anything.
You know and understand this - sociopolitical lag is designed into the system for a reason: to enable fascism to achieve its transformatory goals by doing something fast then getting eventually slightly reigned in years later when the damage is done. Ad infinitum. An aspect of managed theatre. Changing just this to what it should be - fully transparent, analysis led decision-making before any action is allowed, sanctioned or possible - is an act of revolution in itself.
It's common sense to design process flows of how your system should work. It's almost impossible to change, meaningfully The System you live in because it is not meant to be changed by you for your benefit, because it doesn't serve you.
Politicians are fundamentally captured within that system.
If you want to help by testing the above, please take any and all of the letters VST has drafted for use and send them over and over, periodically, to the following people in the EuroParliament, until you get engagement:
Cristian Terhes
Christine Anderson
Rob Roos
Virginie Joron
Clare Daly
Mick Wallace
If you have something or know something and you think specific people should know, don't bother assuming they've got it. Just be the one who sends it to them, then you know they got it.
Interesting.... the politicians you mention bar Daly and Wallace were the ones I was thinking of.
I guess my thinking is that it’s all theatre... that the political system is under complete capture. That those who purport to be about liberty and justice are making the right noises are simply arse covering and nothing will ever change in reality.
I’m from Ireland... it’s a very small place in reality, unlike most Western European nations things are very local. I could quite literally find out Daly and Wallace’s home addresses in about 15 minutes and make my own enquiries of them (although on vaccine related issues I haven’t heard a peep). Not that a house call would make much difference.
In fact most politicians in Ireland live in quite modest homes amongst their constituents which is something I couldn’t quite fathom. If the shit hits the fan... it won’t end well... I guess they know something we don’t? Excess deaths here remain astonishingly high so perhaps they really don’t have much to worry about? A new voting bloc is being imported en masse. Or perhaps I’m imagining it all.
Anyway... strange times... it’s probably my fever dream doing the thinking again?
As Oliver Cromwell said... ‘to hell or to Connaught’...
That ain’t far enough away from this bullshit anymore...
Let's think about this very very slowly....how do the 99% chained slaves on the Atlantic middle passage slave ship break their chains, rise up and force the 1%'s middle-management upper deckers to walk the plank? By telling them repeatedly on substack for the past 3.5 years that the official story is a lie! And continuing to tell them this over and over again on substack for the indefinite future. But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA. Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct.
And please confirm that you believe that none of VST's content has ever comprised some form of actions or instructions of what action to take? And none of it ever intimates modes of thought or analysis that might show others ways of thinking that they can use to come up with their own actions?
You advocate for bloggers, VST included, explicitly telling people, in no uncertain terms, what they should do to the point of providing specific and detailed instructions?
These questions are not asked with the intent to be argumentative or defensive, but your comment sounds sarcastic and at odds with your restacking this article.
Also, there are other things in the VST pipeline and back catalogue that do constitute specific instructions.
No, for the time being, I am advocating following the existing structures of western democracy. For example, if what you perceive is true, then you should be actively volunteering, donating and supporting candidates like Rfk Jr or similar candidates in the UK and elsewhere.
Yes; much better to criticize and alienate anyone who might agree with your covid views and see how well that works out in making things better. Like I said; circular firing squad!
Let's break down the coherence of your total engagement with VST on this Back Test article.
You said:
"Let's think about this very very slowly....how do the 99% chained slaves on the Atlantic middle passage slave ship break their chains, rise up and force the 1%'s middle-management upper deckers to walk the plank? By telling them repeatedly on substack for the past 3.5 years that the official story is a lie! And continuing to tell them this over and over again on substack for the indefinite future."
This is an explicitly sarcastic dig at VST and likely many other writers. Essentially you're claiming that all that needs to happen for citizens to take back power is for enough other people to tell them why they're getting fucked, which will be enough to foment spontaneous uprising, obviously a sarcastic statement as we all know that's not true, and VST says this time and again: people don't and won't act, even when they are stood at the edge of the grave they were forced to dig. You make a direct reference to VST's closing lines about how, in the past, large numbers of people have been enslaved and killed and they in their numbers largely did not fight back.
What you have opened with is, by our reading, a sideswipe at VST, AKA a form of criticism. If we've read that wrong, feel free to explain.
That you move from VST's reference of people having been put on ships and trains in the past for bad ends, to the ridiculous notion of a slave nailed to a ship being empowered to defeat steel shackles by a story shows that you have utterly misinterpreted what VST wrote. What people should face, understand and accept is that most humans are not the naturally strong, independent, fierce fighters they might tell themselves they are in life or under the right circumstances of extreme oppression. In actual fact, as the last 100 years and COVID shows, most people behave like cattle when push comes to shove because of persistent forces of law, actual force, pain, threat of death, the exploitation of sociopolitical and financial systems that the citizens are subject to and dependent upon but do not control, and the successful use of other people in adequate or greater numbers (with equipment and techniques) to oppress The Others. This is a persistent, repetitive aspect of humanity and western civilisation's latter design (to soften the masses) yet citizens are incapable of learning this for themselves. It is not a coincidence that current events are taking place after all WW2 veterans have died. That generation represented the largest number of widespread violent, brutalised killers in western society at any one time. Those who came home were capable of actually fighting. Now, only a minority of citizens are trained to fight and kill an enemy and have used those skills in very warped conflict paradigms that many of them know are pointless or false, hence their mental conflict. As we have said before, there's no armed uprising in the USA under its 2A and there never will be.
"But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA."
Taken generally, you could be referring to many things here, including divide and conquer, poor education, and lots of other big picture things that you know VST fully recognises and sympathises about. Equally you could be saying, and we think you are, that VST is just about pontificating without any specifically actionable items of value for readers. If you are, that would be another direct criticism from you of us. We're not sure what you mean by "circular firing squad organised by the CIA" beyond the obvious: that in a largescale information warfare paradigm, the CIA achieves control through the dissipation of focused collective citizen energy by turning people against each other and confusing them as to what's root cause/important/the enemy etc, hence they go off and attack the wrong people e.g. each other, and thereby the system is preserved and protected and grows in power. If that's correct, we struggle to see exactly how VST fits in to that, given the masses of content we have put out identifying corrupt state organs variously screwing over and confusing citizens. We even published an article about how to get along in a riot. Point us at another substack that does that.
"Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct."
We actually don't really understand this, as it's a self-contradictory statement and could well be sarcastic or tongue-in-cheek. In the context of VST's output, things aren't OK and they won't be OK if this trajectory continues to be followed without increasing citizen intervention that ends corruption and annihilates fundamental threats that VST and many others have identified and called out. You possibly make a latent criticism of doomsayers in general (of which VST is definitely one) who are able, as we acknowledged upfront, to "self-congratulate for being right about the ongoing doom. This is why we opened the back test acknowledging that it could sound like that but was not intended to be that. We took several paragraphs to state what the article was doing, and it's not the end of the series so it's not just about saying "We predict total collapse and we are still right. Told you so. End." We're writing articles that work together that could be a book. We haven't put out everything on this that we could, but you are not to know that (apart from the clue in the title of Part 1).
You have to ask yourself why VST would go down the road of aggregating multi-subject information, repackaging it, analysing it and then predicting outcomes to later back test? We've explained why.
"Of all the possible scenarios that we could identify from existing information, we think this is what's happening now. Here's also what we've identified as definite lies from bad actors. So, here's what we think you should pay more attention to. Here is also where we think this will lead in the very near and near future. If our predictions turn out to be right, something we're doing or thinking might be right. We'll keep iterating through this test process to identify when we are wrong, to therefore adjust."
In light of your OP, we have then shown how every one of the articles we back tested did, in fact, contain a mixture of provable and now or then proven facts, credible analysis and interpretation, AND actionable items, to the point that half the articles were literally "DO THIS FOR YOURSELF" articles in which VST had literally done all the thinking and all the work for readers, thereby completely avoiding your original criticisms about storytelling and CIA-run murderous circle jerks.
Now, we could have literally confused ourselves about what you ever meant from the the get go.
However, we fail to see how any of what we've written in response in these comments is in any way a criticism OF YOU. It is only a defensive reframe of our content in light of what we interpret as sideswipe criticism from you in your OP.
Please feel free to pick out the literal phrasing of any of our criticisms of you.
And for absolute clarity, we are going to these lengths to respond and engage with you because we are genuinely interested in what you mean by what you have said and how you interpret VST's output. You the reader, are 50% of the writing process. If you interpret our output in a way that's totally different to what we intend, then that's essential information to us, even if it may be something that we cannot or choose not to directly address going forwards.
These products are not vaccines, they are gene therapies and the manufacturers and FDA think they are such. Therefore, what do you think about taking a gene therapy? If you're not comfortable with taking a gene therapy for a respiratory disease, why would you be comfortable taking it if we just changed its name? Maybe think twice about taking gene therapies, especially when the people making them and pushing them are lying to you.
Maybe this Doctor who says lots of things we're wondering, thinking and concerned about is a good guy and we can trust and follow him. But he says he doesn't want to be a leader, just an information provider. What are his true, deeper background, capability, motives, incentives and actions? What degree of trust and scrutiny do people who come to the fore deserve, especially when they are attracting your trust and followership on medical issues? What other examples of leadership should we be wary of, as a reminder of what power is and leads to? Why do you think, for a second, you know who Robert Malone is or what he does when you aren't there?
COVID is literally zero threat to your child but gene therapies are a threat. The statistical difference between the two is orders of magnitude. The potential risk of gene therapies goes through permanently disabling to fatal. your children may never get COVID and they do they will survive. You're being literally lied to, coerced and manipulated by institutions to allow your child to be a guinea pig and your child is also being directly coerced and manipulated. It's your job, as a parent to retain executive control over your child's safety, no matter how hard that is and no matter how much your child objects. Your child is literally thick as fuck on these matters and are easy to intellectually, rationally and eventually emotionally decimate regarding COVID gene therapies if you have to. If you want a healthy, safe child, you have to come to terms with the possibility that the only way to be certain of that is to refuse, at all costs, gene therapies for the near future, while all this evidence continues to grow.
Make a choice: look for the truth, no matter how fucking ugly and act on it, or ignore it or attach to narratives and act on them. The potential outcomes for either are radically different. One of them could see you literally drowning in your own shit and piss because you lose neurological control over your body, or you have a stroke, or a heart attack. Death guarantees you shit and piss yourself. Often best to delay that guaranteed event for as long as possible.
This letter contains fully referenced mechanistic issues that will teach you about what is going on with these gene therapies and how the institutions are lying to you about them. It will also guide your critical thinking through the use of carefully constructed questions around these complex issues that are educational and challenging for any reader. Send this letter to any and all the suggested recipients to help hold them accountable.
This is a lay explanation of a legal contract and how it literally fucks your life up. We are educating you about the contract, the product, the circumstances, the downstream meaning of what you should think about the gene therapies that need to be bought using such a contract and therefore what's really going on. Why the fuck would you want to take a product that needs to be sold via such a contract. Don't you smell a rat and a stench on rotting fish at the same time? Maybe go and start challenging your cunt politicians about just why they actual fuck they signed up to these cunt terms on your behalf and made you a bunch of sucker guinea pigs?
Now you've been educated about cunty contracts that fuck your life up, here's a readymade letter to use to challenge the cunts who are fucking your life up. Send this letter to the cunts in your country. As per previous, we've DONE ALL THE FUCKING WORK FOR YOU. ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS CLICK SEND.
Hey, you're being taken for a ride. Here's a way of thinking about what is actually being done to you, and here's a suggestion that you still have the choice, ways and means to act. Maybe take some time and think about actions you want to or could or should take, with whom and how. Here's also a breakdown of how medics are not to be trusted because they've literally all been bought off, so you need to treat them all with contempt and suspicion and find a way to act without being subverted by them while also considering how to confront and deal with them. If you have half a brain, the previously provided letters and articles that are full of referenced evidence equips you to directly challenge medics on technical grounds expose their corruption, ignorance, ineptitude and vested interests.
Ever wondered how the fuck the world actually works at large scale, and why you get fucked by entities and governments all the time? Why's it one rule for thee and another rule for me? Well, here's an explanation. If you can think in terms of this model, the world suddenly makes a fuck sight more sense to the point that you can see the logic that underpins most actions in the world. Yes, this is a bit like "follow the money", but it's more than that. This also gives you workable, understandable context and structure for your tiny mind to get a handle on a global system you'll never really be a part of. Now, with that in mind, you can contextualise that you are a tiny part of a hugely asymmetric war but if you know your objective (blow the tracks) you can actually work out how to fight. But you have to want to think and act. If you are a lazy dope cunt who wants others to do all the thinking and all the acting and you want to sit on your arse and be saved, you're a useless eater.
Per several open theories, the data is showing that ACM is increasing and so people are actually dying in increasing numbers post gene therapy. Here's some of what this means for you and society, so if you understand this, you can start thinking ahead about what society will become over some timeframe and some rate. Specifically, if your family and loved ones are dosed, you may want to spend more loving time with them in case they die much sooner than you are otherwise expecting. Oh, and if society is going to reduce in size and therefore break down, you might want to think about how you prepare for that.
Now, Joel, does the above fit your statement:
"But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA. Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct."
No. It doesn't.
But you haven't read the above articles, have you?
"Talk is cheap , work within the political process to change things"
It's obvious that VST readers will see the immediate contradictions and fallacies in that statement, as well as the inherent contradictions and fallacies between that statement and your opening comment.
In case you hadn't noticed, the political process is delivering to itself all of the outcomes that it wants and that most normal citizens don't. Like Agenda 21/2030/2050, the WHO IHR, collapsing financial systems, radically increasing interest rates, property & wealth transfer.
If you do not track rate of progress of "both sides" within the existing system and processes, you might well convince yourself that some average joe is clawing back enough. If you chart it out on a napkin, you'll see everyone's getting fucked harder and faster, in line with stated objectives going back to the 1960s.
But it's OK. Just vote for that guy and it'll all be good.
"Which guy?"
"The one whose party is literally suppressing in plain sight in congressional hearings, with defamatory statements, and by changing in real time any and every process and rule that they want."
"Trust the process."
"But the process is literally being changed in real time to suit them and fuck him. It's already been like this for the guy with the bad hair."
A lot to digest. I’ll try to read some of the older posts as you are correct... we tend to only read forward.
The contract issue is a interesting one. I think I got a copy of the un-redacted version of the Pfizer contract the EU commission signed from a link posted on Twitter around 18 months ago. So it is in the public domain somewhat. I mean I’m nobody, I didn’t dig particularly hard and I have it... go figure.
So it’s interesting that some MEP’s were calling for the release of the uncensored version (the original is essentially a modern art masterpiece of permanent marker blacking out all the pertinent bits) whilst I had already read through it and determined it to be quite the horror show.
So it left me scratching my head. If a Joe Soap like me can get my hands on it surely they can? So what gives? I haven’t followed the situation too closely but it seems the contract issue has dropped from sight. Was it ever discussed again in the EU parliament?
Maybe what I downloaded was fake? But I did check the redacted version (the bits you could read) and it seemed to align with what was in it.
So the information is out there, no one, i.e. investigative journalists, MEP’s, etc. seems to want to discuss it anymore.
Is it a lack of will, a legal issue, are they bought and paid for, etc.? Or did I miss something? Was it all a fever dream on my part?
Answers on a postcard to the usual address please...
You make interesting points re contracts, politicians and knowledge.
VST can tell you for certain that it is pointless to assume anything about a politician's knowledge, skill, interests, ability, care or agenda, irrespective of what they say in public. The only metric of a politician is what you can find out about what they do. Nothing else matters.
One factor is time. There's literally no way a politician can represent the interests of their constituents on time and ratio basis. This is why you have to find ways to force their awareness of an issue then pressure them endlessly in any way you can imagine until they act, and often they never will (due agenda and other factors). The entirety of the British House of Commons is corrupt and controlled by multiple layers of fear inducing systems from money, the Party system, the intelligence services and worse. This is documented fact and Andrew Bridgen literally states this on camera.
This is why VST has put out the letters and asked readers to engage, in order to get on to the radar of some politicians, while simultaneously testing the will and engagement of our readers. Guess what we found? Your guess will be right.
Andrew Bridgen acknowledged receipt of our recent letter, asked for us to maintain direct contact with him on his parliamentary email then went quiet. He has the information from us that we think he needs and he knows that McKernan et al are involved in genetic analysis. It is now for him to act visibly in parliament in light of what we and others have given him. Not enough seen yet. He could be doing a hell of al lot more. He should be going up against the MHRA and the NHS leadership for gross negligence manslaughter.
We also sent the same information to some Euro MEPs and heard zero back from them. No doubt, we should try again. They could be going up against the EMA and nation health systems like Bridgen could. You could build revolutions around those challenges if you were a skilled politician.
Now, regarding contracts, Cristian Terhes et al (incl Christine Anderson) were the ones who held up the redacted Euro contract and called out Von Der Leyen re her secret and corrupt Pfizer deals. Why they didn't get sent by others incl @ehdenbiber the unredacted contracts to hold up, I don't know. Maybe they did.
Look at Rob Roos. Asks decent questions in occasional fora, but where's the endless onslaught against the system? See what is happening in the Aussie parliament now via Gerrard Rennick and Alex Antic. The reason why those Aussie MPs are able to do what they are doing is because behind them are several citizens constantly feeding them information and telling them what to understand, how to understand it and what they can challenge and do. They aren't operating independently. They're being massively helped and briefed by people who spent ages building that relationship with them, and they are all three years late. Those challenges should have happened up front, globally, before anyone took anything.
You know and understand this - sociopolitical lag is designed into the system for a reason: to enable fascism to achieve its transformatory goals by doing something fast then getting eventually slightly reigned in years later when the damage is done. Ad infinitum. An aspect of managed theatre. Changing just this to what it should be - fully transparent, analysis led decision-making before any action is allowed, sanctioned or possible - is an act of revolution in itself.
It's common sense to design process flows of how your system should work. It's almost impossible to change, meaningfully The System you live in because it is not meant to be changed by you for your benefit, because it doesn't serve you.
Politicians are fundamentally captured within that system.
If you want to help by testing the above, please take any and all of the letters VST has drafted for use and send them over and over, periodically, to the following people in the EuroParliament, until you get engagement:
Cristian Terhes
Christine Anderson
Rob Roos
Virginie Joron
Clare Daly
Mick Wallace
If you have something or know something and you think specific people should know, don't bother assuming they've got it. Just be the one who sends it to them, then you know they got it.
Interesting.... the politicians you mention bar Daly and Wallace were the ones I was thinking of.
I guess my thinking is that it’s all theatre... that the political system is under complete capture. That those who purport to be about liberty and justice are making the right noises are simply arse covering and nothing will ever change in reality.
I’m from Ireland... it’s a very small place in reality, unlike most Western European nations things are very local. I could quite literally find out Daly and Wallace’s home addresses in about 15 minutes and make my own enquiries of them (although on vaccine related issues I haven’t heard a peep). Not that a house call would make much difference.
In fact most politicians in Ireland live in quite modest homes amongst their constituents which is something I couldn’t quite fathom. If the shit hits the fan... it won’t end well... I guess they know something we don’t? Excess deaths here remain astonishingly high so perhaps they really don’t have much to worry about? A new voting bloc is being imported en masse. Or perhaps I’m imagining it all.
Anyway... strange times... it’s probably my fever dream doing the thinking again?
As Oliver Cromwell said... ‘to hell or to Connaught’...
That ain’t far enough away from this bullshit anymore...
May I suggest... ‘to hell or Kamchatka’...
See you all there...
Let's think about this very very slowly....how do the 99% chained slaves on the Atlantic middle passage slave ship break their chains, rise up and force the 1%'s middle-management upper deckers to walk the plank? By telling them repeatedly on substack for the past 3.5 years that the official story is a lie! And continuing to tell them this over and over again on substack for the indefinite future. But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA. Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct.
Our judgement of your tone leads us you believe that you are chiding us, as requested. Thanks for engaging.
We'll address your sentiments in an article in due course. In the meantime, please read this when you have a chance:
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/the-ship-part-one-where-is-hms-covid
And please confirm that you believe that none of VST's content has ever comprised some form of actions or instructions of what action to take? And none of it ever intimates modes of thought or analysis that might show others ways of thinking that they can use to come up with their own actions?
You advocate for bloggers, VST included, explicitly telling people, in no uncertain terms, what they should do to the point of providing specific and detailed instructions?
These questions are not asked with the intent to be argumentative or defensive, but your comment sounds sarcastic and at odds with your restacking this article.
Also, there are other things in the VST pipeline and back catalogue that do constitute specific instructions.
No, for the time being, I am advocating following the existing structures of western democracy. For example, if what you perceive is true, then you should be actively volunteering, donating and supporting candidates like Rfk Jr or similar candidates in the UK and elsewhere.
OK, so you think RFK Jr, a single person inside the most rigged political system on the planet, is going to save you.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Yes; much better to criticize and alienate anyone who might agree with your covid views and see how well that works out in making things better. Like I said; circular firing squad!
Let's break down the coherence of your total engagement with VST on this Back Test article.
You said:
"Let's think about this very very slowly....how do the 99% chained slaves on the Atlantic middle passage slave ship break their chains, rise up and force the 1%'s middle-management upper deckers to walk the plank? By telling them repeatedly on substack for the past 3.5 years that the official story is a lie! And continuing to tell them this over and over again on substack for the indefinite future."
This is an explicitly sarcastic dig at VST and likely many other writers. Essentially you're claiming that all that needs to happen for citizens to take back power is for enough other people to tell them why they're getting fucked, which will be enough to foment spontaneous uprising, obviously a sarcastic statement as we all know that's not true, and VST says this time and again: people don't and won't act, even when they are stood at the edge of the grave they were forced to dig. You make a direct reference to VST's closing lines about how, in the past, large numbers of people have been enslaved and killed and they in their numbers largely did not fight back.
What you have opened with is, by our reading, a sideswipe at VST, AKA a form of criticism. If we've read that wrong, feel free to explain.
That you move from VST's reference of people having been put on ships and trains in the past for bad ends, to the ridiculous notion of a slave nailed to a ship being empowered to defeat steel shackles by a story shows that you have utterly misinterpreted what VST wrote. What people should face, understand and accept is that most humans are not the naturally strong, independent, fierce fighters they might tell themselves they are in life or under the right circumstances of extreme oppression. In actual fact, as the last 100 years and COVID shows, most people behave like cattle when push comes to shove because of persistent forces of law, actual force, pain, threat of death, the exploitation of sociopolitical and financial systems that the citizens are subject to and dependent upon but do not control, and the successful use of other people in adequate or greater numbers (with equipment and techniques) to oppress The Others. This is a persistent, repetitive aspect of humanity and western civilisation's latter design (to soften the masses) yet citizens are incapable of learning this for themselves. It is not a coincidence that current events are taking place after all WW2 veterans have died. That generation represented the largest number of widespread violent, brutalised killers in western society at any one time. Those who came home were capable of actually fighting. Now, only a minority of citizens are trained to fight and kill an enemy and have used those skills in very warped conflict paradigms that many of them know are pointless or false, hence their mental conflict. As we have said before, there's no armed uprising in the USA under its 2A and there never will be.
"But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA."
Taken generally, you could be referring to many things here, including divide and conquer, poor education, and lots of other big picture things that you know VST fully recognises and sympathises about. Equally you could be saying, and we think you are, that VST is just about pontificating without any specifically actionable items of value for readers. If you are, that would be another direct criticism from you of us. We're not sure what you mean by "circular firing squad organised by the CIA" beyond the obvious: that in a largescale information warfare paradigm, the CIA achieves control through the dissipation of focused collective citizen energy by turning people against each other and confusing them as to what's root cause/important/the enemy etc, hence they go off and attack the wrong people e.g. each other, and thereby the system is preserved and protected and grows in power. If that's correct, we struggle to see exactly how VST fits in to that, given the masses of content we have put out identifying corrupt state organs variously screwing over and confusing citizens. We even published an article about how to get along in a riot. Point us at another substack that does that.
"Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct."
We actually don't really understand this, as it's a self-contradictory statement and could well be sarcastic or tongue-in-cheek. In the context of VST's output, things aren't OK and they won't be OK if this trajectory continues to be followed without increasing citizen intervention that ends corruption and annihilates fundamental threats that VST and many others have identified and called out. You possibly make a latent criticism of doomsayers in general (of which VST is definitely one) who are able, as we acknowledged upfront, to "self-congratulate for being right about the ongoing doom. This is why we opened the back test acknowledging that it could sound like that but was not intended to be that. We took several paragraphs to state what the article was doing, and it's not the end of the series so it's not just about saying "We predict total collapse and we are still right. Told you so. End." We're writing articles that work together that could be a book. We haven't put out everything on this that we could, but you are not to know that (apart from the clue in the title of Part 1).
You have to ask yourself why VST would go down the road of aggregating multi-subject information, repackaging it, analysing it and then predicting outcomes to later back test? We've explained why.
"Of all the possible scenarios that we could identify from existing information, we think this is what's happening now. Here's also what we've identified as definite lies from bad actors. So, here's what we think you should pay more attention to. Here is also where we think this will lead in the very near and near future. If our predictions turn out to be right, something we're doing or thinking might be right. We'll keep iterating through this test process to identify when we are wrong, to therefore adjust."
In light of your OP, we have then shown how every one of the articles we back tested did, in fact, contain a mixture of provable and now or then proven facts, credible analysis and interpretation, AND actionable items, to the point that half the articles were literally "DO THIS FOR YOURSELF" articles in which VST had literally done all the thinking and all the work for readers, thereby completely avoiding your original criticisms about storytelling and CIA-run murderous circle jerks.
Now, we could have literally confused ourselves about what you ever meant from the the get go.
However, we fail to see how any of what we've written in response in these comments is in any way a criticism OF YOU. It is only a defensive reframe of our content in light of what we interpret as sideswipe criticism from you in your OP.
Please feel free to pick out the literal phrasing of any of our criticisms of you.
And for absolute clarity, we are going to these lengths to respond and engage with you because we are genuinely interested in what you mean by what you have said and how you interpret VST's output. You the reader, are 50% of the writing process. If you interpret our output in a way that's totally different to what we intend, then that's essential information to us, even if it may be something that we cannot or choose not to directly address going forwards.
To give greater clarity to our previous response, let's consider the content of the articles we just back tested.
Let's boil them down and distil any instructional messages contained within the articles.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/one-label-to-rule-them-all
These products are not vaccines, they are gene therapies and the manufacturers and FDA think they are such. Therefore, what do you think about taking a gene therapy? If you're not comfortable with taking a gene therapy for a respiratory disease, why would you be comfortable taking it if we just changed its name? Maybe think twice about taking gene therapies, especially when the people making them and pushing them are lying to you.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/home-alone-malone
Maybe this Doctor who says lots of things we're wondering, thinking and concerned about is a good guy and we can trust and follow him. But he says he doesn't want to be a leader, just an information provider. What are his true, deeper background, capability, motives, incentives and actions? What degree of trust and scrutiny do people who come to the fore deserve, especially when they are attracting your trust and followership on medical issues? What other examples of leadership should we be wary of, as a reminder of what power is and leads to? Why do you think, for a second, you know who Robert Malone is or what he does when you aren't there?
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/buy-one-get-one-free
COVID is literally zero threat to your child but gene therapies are a threat. The statistical difference between the two is orders of magnitude. The potential risk of gene therapies goes through permanently disabling to fatal. your children may never get COVID and they do they will survive. You're being literally lied to, coerced and manipulated by institutions to allow your child to be a guinea pig and your child is also being directly coerced and manipulated. It's your job, as a parent to retain executive control over your child's safety, no matter how hard that is and no matter how much your child objects. Your child is literally thick as fuck on these matters and are easy to intellectually, rationally and eventually emotionally decimate regarding COVID gene therapies if you have to. If you want a healthy, safe child, you have to come to terms with the possibility that the only way to be certain of that is to refuse, at all costs, gene therapies for the near future, while all this evidence continues to grow.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/rising-damp
Make a choice: look for the truth, no matter how fucking ugly and act on it, or ignore it or attach to narratives and act on them. The potential outcomes for either are radically different. One of them could see you literally drowning in your own shit and piss because you lose neurological control over your body, or you have a stroke, or a heart attack. Death guarantees you shit and piss yourself. Often best to delay that guaranteed event for as long as possible.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/uk-covid-19-vaccine-regulatory-issues
This letter contains fully referenced mechanistic issues that will teach you about what is going on with these gene therapies and how the institutions are lying to you about them. It will also guide your critical thinking through the use of carefully constructed questions around these complex issues that are educational and challenging for any reader. Send this letter to any and all the suggested recipients to help hold them accountable.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/uk-covid-19-vaccine-categorisation
See above.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/corporate-stranglehold-on-global
This is a lay explanation of a legal contract and how it literally fucks your life up. We are educating you about the contract, the product, the circumstances, the downstream meaning of what you should think about the gene therapies that need to be bought using such a contract and therefore what's really going on. Why the fuck would you want to take a product that needs to be sold via such a contract. Don't you smell a rat and a stench on rotting fish at the same time? Maybe go and start challenging your cunt politicians about just why they actual fuck they signed up to these cunt terms on your behalf and made you a bunch of sucker guinea pigs?
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/letter-to-mpslordsdhscmhra-re-pfizer
Now you've been educated about cunty contracts that fuck your life up, here's a readymade letter to use to challenge the cunts who are fucking your life up. Send this letter to the cunts in your country. As per previous, we've DONE ALL THE FUCKING WORK FOR YOU. ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS CLICK SEND.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/the-ship-part-one-where-is-hms-covid
Hey, you're being taken for a ride. Here's a way of thinking about what is actually being done to you, and here's a suggestion that you still have the choice, ways and means to act. Maybe take some time and think about actions you want to or could or should take, with whom and how. Here's also a breakdown of how medics are not to be trusted because they've literally all been bought off, so you need to treat them all with contempt and suspicion and find a way to act without being subverted by them while also considering how to confront and deal with them. If you have half a brain, the previously provided letters and articles that are full of referenced evidence equips you to directly challenge medics on technical grounds expose their corruption, ignorance, ineptitude and vested interests.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/the-train-a-metaphor-for-the-current
Ever wondered how the fuck the world actually works at large scale, and why you get fucked by entities and governments all the time? Why's it one rule for thee and another rule for me? Well, here's an explanation. If you can think in terms of this model, the world suddenly makes a fuck sight more sense to the point that you can see the logic that underpins most actions in the world. Yes, this is a bit like "follow the money", but it's more than that. This also gives you workable, understandable context and structure for your tiny mind to get a handle on a global system you'll never really be a part of. Now, with that in mind, you can contextualise that you are a tiny part of a hugely asymmetric war but if you know your objective (blow the tracks) you can actually work out how to fight. But you have to want to think and act. If you are a lazy dope cunt who wants others to do all the thinking and all the acting and you want to sit on your arse and be saved, you're a useless eater.
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/canary-in-the-coalmine-all-cause
Per several open theories, the data is showing that ACM is increasing and so people are actually dying in increasing numbers post gene therapy. Here's some of what this means for you and society, so if you understand this, you can start thinking ahead about what society will become over some timeframe and some rate. Specifically, if your family and loved ones are dosed, you may want to spend more loving time with them in case they die much sooner than you are otherwise expecting. Oh, and if society is going to reduce in size and therefore break down, you might want to think about how you prepare for that.
Now, Joel, does the above fit your statement:
"But make sure that each substacker has no coherent plan to change anything and that they all squabble with each other in a circular firing squad organized by the CIA. Everything will be hunky dory as long as our past predictions of total collapse continue to turn out correct."
No. It doesn't.
But you haven't read the above articles, have you?
Talk is cheap , work within the political process to change things
"Talk is cheap , work within the political process to change things"
It's obvious that VST readers will see the immediate contradictions and fallacies in that statement, as well as the inherent contradictions and fallacies between that statement and your opening comment.
In case you hadn't noticed, the political process is delivering to itself all of the outcomes that it wants and that most normal citizens don't. Like Agenda 21/2030/2050, the WHO IHR, collapsing financial systems, radically increasing interest rates, property & wealth transfer.
If you do not track rate of progress of "both sides" within the existing system and processes, you might well convince yourself that some average joe is clawing back enough. If you chart it out on a napkin, you'll see everyone's getting fucked harder and faster, in line with stated objectives going back to the 1960s.
But it's OK. Just vote for that guy and it'll all be good.
"Which guy?"
"The one whose party is literally suppressing in plain sight in congressional hearings, with defamatory statements, and by changing in real time any and every process and rule that they want."
"Trust the process."
"But the process is literally being changed in real time to suit them and fuck him. It's already been like this for the guy with the bad hair."
"...."