Back test: VST on COVID Part 1

From Nov 21 to Feb 22

Objective

This article will undoubtedly come across as self-congratulatory. This is not the purpose or the intent. You may find it depressing but you should ask whether you want VST to deal and speak in reality as it sees it for you to critique, or whether you want to deal in piecemeal hints of reality interspersed with fantasy. VST is about finding provable truth and working from there.

VST’s back tests are genuine attempts to do something rarely done in the media and commentary spheres - the holding of oneself to account, in public.

Depending upon how long you have been a reader, you may not know what VST is actually about. It’s not about COVID or Ukraine or Peer Review or Joe Rogan’s censorship or…

VST is about successfully integrating knowledge of the world in such a way and to such an extent that one can roughly work out enough of the big picture so as to be able to reliably know what will happen next. Not in everything, not everywhere, not so far ahead of time with no other knowledge. Of course not. That’s impossible-ish. But, with an adequate lens it is possible to look at a blurred scene and make it look clearer. VST is about parsing the narrative through adequately built (informed) lenses to see more of the actual truth. Finding truth is what enables future prediction. You cannot predict the actual future if you only know and believe an invented, mutable narrative.

If you cannot break down narrative and identify lies, you are an information and perception slave. If you cannot question your own perception and modify it in light of new information, you have enslaved yourself.

These back tests are how VST works out if it’s talking shit or not. On this basis, VST can work out whether it’s doing something wrong and you can work out whether you should keep reading.

If you haven’t been here that long, and/or you haven’t read much of the VST back catalogue, you may simply take the work on piecemeal basis, at face value. If that works for you and that’s why you subscribe, that’s enough.

We’ve gone to this format for these back tests to introduce the current readership to VST’s old work. This back test format gives you a link to the article and some kind of overview of it with and we determine how we did with the article. Most people don’t read old articles in a substack; they only read forwards, not backwards. Maybe you’ll change your behaviour in respect of a few of VST’s articles that you’ve never seen before. Maybe not.

Also, consider this. VST has never claimed to be a specialist in anything, we might be, but that’s not for you to know. This makes it impossible for you to play credentialism with us. It also forces you and us to come together purely on the basis of what is provided on the page, not what lingers in the background of your knowledge and assumptions about VST.

VST is not about its authors. It’s about ways of evaluating information from many sources about many things. If you think about how the world works, oftentimes its the generalists who can bring together the disparate, seemingly separate specialist strands and weave them together into a picture that makes sense to a wider audience. In VST’s experience, being a specialist does not mean one is more capable or intelligent than others; sometimes, it means quite the opposite. Specialists can often be grossly deficient and ignorant. Often, people are both specialists and generalists to varying degrees. The world needs specialists and generalists alike in order to weave life’s rich tapestry.

That’s what VST tries to do. Back tests are a way of working out if we’re actually doing it. If you think this is article self-indulgent or (when we get things right) excessively self-congratulatory, you can chide us in the comments, or delete anything with the word “back test” in the title forever more. When we identify fuck ups, we’ll do our best to make the self-deprecation worth reading.

Everyone loves watching someone punch themselves in the face.

---

VST’s debut article was exactly correct and is more accurate today than it was in November 2021. Language has been totally subverted as a key means to propagandistically and cognitively control the majority of the population on specific COVID matters such as the nature of the pandemic, learned and enforced responses, and the COVID gene therapies.

This linguistic subversion is literally everywhere, all the time and transcends the pandemic. It is a fundamental tool in the re-engineering and takeover of modern societies across the globe. It is an essential tool in Cognitive Warfare. It is not new but it is obvious that huge amounts of people don’t get this or see it. This Orwellian technique pervades every narrative from medical and health, through climate and war to UFOs.

COVID gene therapies are exactly that; they contain genetically modified organisms and they act genetically. They are toxic and harmful, incorrectly and inadequately regulated and illegally approved. Despite this, most opponents do not refer to them by their proper descriptor: gene therapies. They have been legally classified as vaccines by using specific legal constructs that significantly precede 2020 and this is well known amongst a minority, but they also remain fully compliant with the classification of gene therapy, which is deliberately silenced. The simple fact that probably 97% of all people still use the term “vaccine”, even when they are firmly in the know and in the anti-COVID camp, tells you about the power of the linguistic technique and about these people.

VST pondered the nature and backstory of Dr. Robert Malone in the context of COVID: how did such an insider and technical expert not know what was going on to the point that he and his wife both took two doses of Moderna’s gene therapy, suffered SAE and then started scratching their heads while their hearts palpitated and their legs twitched? Since then, Malone has taken a prominent spokesperson role to some degree of good. But what is the big picture? Why didn’t Malone RTFM before getting dosed? What’s he really done and achieved since?

There are three vectors involved in the above article: ignorance, duplicity and the pursuit of interests. VST has for a long time stood back and watched the people involved in the anti-COVID narrative and tried to evaluate them on a kind of triple axis of right(eous)ness, grift and benefit. It’s actually hard to be certain and render specific judgement without deep insider knowledge, but VST has been in contact with quite a number of anti-COVID actors and the sentiments VST has formed about them remain relatively consistent to this day.

VST’s articles around this area have largely deliberately avoided labelling specific COVID actors as X, Y, or Z. Instead, VST has tried to write articles on specific subject matter that should enable the reader to question people and issues together and form their own conclusions, or ask more questions. Even grifters can serve a purpose, although there are some who are nothing more than egregious bandwagonistas.

There is a very, very simple question to ask yourself:

Of all the people who are telling you about how bad the pandemic is and various aspects of it, how many of them weaponised what they knew and turned their knowledge and evidence into a coherent and focused attack, while growing a movement around it?

The answer is very, very few. Who took their “knowledge” and made weapons based on that knowledge? Who said “here’s what you need to know, now here’s what you specifically need to do”? Very, very few. Most talk. Most just bounce information between each other and generate a “chargeable opportunity” and plenty of people will pay for that circulation of information without asking for or then creating an action. That’s the ground where grift begins. Where are the Calls to action that the 99% can follow?

Do you get the scale and gravity of that phenomenon/problem?

Do you understand the notion of being blindfolded, in the dark, not knowing where you are? “When you ask, “where am I?” someone answers, “you’re in an alleyway.” Eventually, they tell you “you’re in a dead-end alleyway.” They never tell you how to get out, which way to turn, or what to do. They just breadcrumb you around in the dark and, for some reason, you like paying for breadcrumbs while apparently standing in a dead-end alleyway with a blindfold on.

What’s largely happened is that people have acted as “information or content providers” in various channels of blogging, podcasting, book writing and public speaking, and they have hailed themselves as “leaders” for talking. Few of these people acted. Few of them “produced” from scratch. Most of the prominent people in the anti-COVID narrative act as information repeaters and recyclers who have made money from that activity, yet most people don’t seem to see this.

VST has long been aware of the anti-COVID ecosystem. It’s highly profitable content.

VST is pondering whether to try and explain this in greater detail and with specific examples. It should be fucking obvious to anyone with a brain, but we’re not sure how many people see it the way VST sees it.

The most obvious question of all is this:

If you and the anti-COVID narrators know enough about what’s going on, why, and how, then why’s it all still happening exactly as predicted? Why haven’t root causes been addressed e.g. the political and legislative mechanics that have laid the foundation for all of the pandemic’s elements?

None of these things have been attacked, only the superficial symptoms e.g. vaccine mandates have been challenged in law in some places. The entire enabling framework still exists untouched and the WHO is about to take over at the end of this year. It’s only been three years. All of the underlying framework is decades old and untouched. Why is that?

What has Malone and his ilk helped to defeat? If they got rich(er) along the way is it in their interest to terminally defeat the entire COVID narrative? If they did, just what the fuck are they going to make content about?

You should be prepared to constantly evaluate people on the basis of what they are doing and why, no matter who they are or how much you like what they say. True grift depends on you failing to do this. Just ask the Clintons and the Bidens.

COVID and gene therapies in children, Gillick competence and the collective fallout for families was the topic of this article and a second article that was written by a dear and kind subscriber,

Omicron

.

The key issues were:

• inability of parents and children to adequately evaluate risks and benefits;

• deliberately subverted information about the risks of COVID and gene therapies;

• the state inserting itself between the parent and the child using sophisticated and nefarious techniques; that

• were designed to totally undermine the sanctity of parent child relationships and exert excessive, disproportionate power on the the child that then translated into an indirect means of state control over the parent;

• the destruction of family via the doing of psychological, emotional and physical harms to the family and its individual members via COVID and the gene therapies.

All of the above was correct. It has been proven by: the ongoing evidence of COVID’s nature, origins and actual risk; the increasing proof of the uselessness and harms of the gene therapies; the evidence that state and corporate actors all willingly lied and manipulated global populations for power, control and profit agendas.

As VST said, families who have been harmed or injured by COVID gene therapies have indeed taken (dis)advantage of the “Buy one get one free offer” that their taxes paid for: they’ve lost parents, siblings or children and have to deal with that while also dealing with the attendant psychological, emotional and economic traumas that stem from them doing something to themselves. This continues to this day with people dying and developing vaccine-induced chronic and acute illnesses while government still try to make people dose themselves and their children with now zero evidence of safety or efficacy.

In extremis, this very concept is now being used by the state who is actively gaslighting the populace. Canada and New Zealand are both actively denying that anyone was forced, mandated or coerced into taking a gene therapy. This is nothing short of actual lying, and yet those populations are literally taking that gaslighting lying down. If ever there was hard proof of information and cognitive warfare, learned helplessness, victim mentality and an entire population displaying the characteristics of abused partners, that’s it. It is the same across the globe.

The situation and issues described in this article is directly synonymous with the family and child aspects of the woke agenda. If you do not understand this by now, you do not understand the underlying constructs on which COVID and woke is built. VST will publish on this shortly as part of its Trafficking series. Although it has already explained this in various ways in several articles, a unifying article with very focused referential material is in the pipeline.

“Rising Damp” was a brief, satirical and metaphorical comment on the dichotomy in the emerging pandemic society, similar to the red pill, blue pill concept.

How ignorant do people want to be and how ignorant will they keep themselves?

The truth is, the majority are both wilfully and assistedly ignorant. This should explain the world in large part and at the same time scare the shit out of anyone who didn’t fully realise this was the state of affairs.

George Carlin said “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” Now go outside and think about the statistics of who you are walking past. Most of those people will kill you if they are told to do so by an authority figure. This is what happened in COVID. Most people were proven to be good Nazis and they still don’t even know it.

Everything in the above two letters is correct. All the issues flagged, concerns expressed and even crimes alluded to are real and multiply confirmed and admitted to across research and evidence then and more so now. Corporate and government bodies have since admitted directly or indirectly to almost everything in these two letters.

In January 2021, VST had independently worked out that autoimmune injury and disease was an inherent consequence of the gene therapies’ design. VST suggested this to Dr. Simone Gold and Dr Richard Urso from AFLDS circa Feb 2021 (in front of multiple witnesses). Gold and Urso didn’t know but were sympathetic to VST’s observations. Gold and Urso had heard unconfirmed rumours that the gene therapies could have a deleterious affinity for syncytin-1 and therefore be harmful to fertility, as well as a rumour that the patents revealed they were not vaccines. To VST’s knowledge, cross-reactivity with syncytin-1 has yet to be proven and may have been negatively proven to some degree, but there is clear evidence of both a lack of research into fertility effects and growing proof of harm to fertility. AFLDS were right, then, to simply raise as they did that no one knew what the effect on fertility was, which was in itself a total red flag for the entire human race. Gold was almost right about the patents: in actual fact, the proof was in SEC filings, not patents. VST went looking in patents to the best of its ability and found no “gene therapy” terms there but people found the evidence in other documents. The rest of the world just ignored that evidence, to their detriment.

Do not make the mistake of thinking that the above is VST saying “AFLDS are anti-COVID grifters.” Far from it. AFLDS doctors were the most prescient, active and risk-taking medical professionals in the pandemic. Dr. Simone Gold is under recognized for the battles she fought, the threat she posed to the system and the price she was made to pay. She was ahead of the curve and actually provided service when others were struggling to think.

A year after that meeting with AFLDS, VST expressed its concerns about autoimmunity in these two letters with specific evidential reference to UK government (MHRA) admissions:

In fulfilling just the above primary and secondary objectives, these products could and do induce autoimmune damage within the host. This outcome is inherent in these products' mechanism of action. This is unlike any prior vaccine in use in the human race prior to Covid-19 “vaccine” deployment. That this is mechanistically possible is stated even by the UK Government and MHRA in regulatory documentation, when it describes their mechanism of action:

"The viral spike (S) protein antigen induces an adaptive immune response through neutralising antibodies. Furthermore, as the expressed spike (S) protein is being degraded intracellularly, the resulting peptides can be presented at the cell surface, triggering a specific T cell-mediated immune response with activity against the virus and infected cells."

Now ask yourself how long it has taken for the most prominent and expert voices to publicly connect vaccine injury to autoimmunity? Now ask yourself what the word “expert” means.

These two questions are fundamental to anti-COVID grift. If you do not understand this, you aren’t thinking hard enough.

It has taken the best part of three years for vaccine-induced autoimmunity to become a repetitive term or concept in the anti-COVID minority, yet it was fundamentally self-evident in the basic design of all forms of COVID gene therapy to the point that a self-educated, lay generalist could identify the concept alone as soon as the mechanism of action was understood in lay terms from sources comprising Wikipedia, the pharma marketing materials, the press and government high level bullshit. Specialist research papers and knowledge was not required to work this out. Dr. Robert Malone never, ever mentioned this following his vaccine injuries. How did he not know vaccine-induced autoimmunity was a baked-in feature that would cause fatalities and permanent damage? How long has it taken Dr. Peter McCullough to state that vaccine-induced myocarditis is a product of autoimmunity? If they did know a long time ago, why didn’t they directly say it the moment they appeared on the scene? It took a surprising number of experts/specialists a surprising amount of time to work this out and then start saying it in public. Why?

This is not a conspiratorial question. There are very straightforward possible answers to do with how people think.

Ehden Biber

did the world a service that is inadequately recognised when he acquired, verified and leaked the Brazilian and other vaccine supply contracts to the world. That you are now only beginning to see supply contract stories in the edges of the mainstream press in the EU and a few other territories is totally misleading. The contracts have been partially but significantly known about for years. Reporting was deliberately and aggressively suppressed and no one has ever tried to sue anyone for leaking or sharing what are commercially and governmentally secret documents. Why? Because their authenticity and therefore their content would have to be admitted to in court, although this was already done in Brazil.

VST summarised the meaning of the Pfizer Brazil (and largely global) contract terms as this:

If your nation bought any Pfizer Covid-19 gene therapy product from Pfizer under the same terms as Brazil, it advance purchased a product:

• with then zero proven efficacy;

• whose ingredients were not fully tested or understood and remain so;

• whose side effect and adverse event profile was literally entirely unknown and still remains largely unknown*;

• for which there was never any long term data available and this remains the case.

Within the scope of this contract, Pfizer only warranted that “at the time of delivery, the Product complies in a material manner with the relevant Specifications”. In the absence of the detail of the Specifications, the express acceptance of a product with unknown efficacy means it could be possible that Pfizer is only contracted to supply a product made of the specified ingredients in a specified way (Good Manufacturing Process) that meets the Specification, but has no specified performance. On the other hand, the Specification could have contained performance criteria tied to trial results around efficacy, for example. Without the Specification we won't know.

Brazil has only 24 hours from time of receipt to exercise its ability to reject detectably defective product. This requires that Brazil has the ability to identify defects of any kind in that timeframe. What if some of those defects only manifest once administered in a subject? Therefore if Brazil can really only reject product on its limited ability to find product defects prior to administration within 24 hours e.g. damaged packaging, identifiable ingredient or consistency problems, cold chain breaches etc, this right to reject is extremely constrained.

All this for a new human medicine destined for global rollout throughout the entire human race.

This contract is nothing short of gazing into the abyss. Your nation state is beholden to a corporation. It may have bought medical product from it that is literally snake oil that your nation has little real ability or capacity to verify before it administers the product - irreversibly - throughout its entire population.

Should the Pfizer gene therapy turn out to be either snake oil or, worse, toxic snake oil, there's no comeback for the nation state and the citizen may pay an additional price: their health and independence or their life.

Now, why is mention of supply contracts of this magnitude of corporate power that affect the entire globe, that were leaked over six months ago, completely absent from almost all media?

*And may never be formally, fully causally admitted given the nature of the products’ mechanism of action; variable time for detectable corollary effects to manifest; potential nature and spectrum of those effects.

All of this is correct and has been confirmed directly by multiple scientific, medical and political evidence, as well as others’ recent characterisation of EU and other contracts, especially with respect to the fact that governments bought gigantic amounts of products that had zero proven efficacy or safety with no safety net or right to return, and put up national assets as security to get them.

Up until the several if not few months, scrutiny of the contracts Ehden made available was almost non-existent and confined to social media posts of a handful of Awake channels, yet it is all primary evidence of corruption and madness that we have had available to us for two years now.

The supply contracts explain in large part why and how the situation is what it is. They are a predictive base for what would happen, yet most people ignored what they meant.

VST also highlighted and explained what ISDS is. Make no mistake - if you think that sorting this shit out is a straightforward contract issue, you have to factor what goes through or around ISDS. If you cannot bypass or overrule it e.g. by proving fraud and thereby annulling the contracts with ISDS in them, ISDS will NEVER help the nation or you. It will only result in the suppliers being made whole for the full, pre-agreed value of the contracts.

Remember when someone said that it would cost the UK more to cancel its useless aircraft carriers than it would to build them and never use them? That’s the nature of ISDS: it fucks you completely and serves the fascist corporatocracy completely. That’s why you don’t know about it but your government does and it willingly signs contracts with it in, which is yet more hard proof that your government is a G3P policy enforcer whose purpose is to use you to transfer wealth via public debt to private fascistic corporate and special interest groups.

The content of this letter is correct, based upon VST’s reading of the Brazil Pfizer contract. Everything in this letter is as valid and important today as it was when published. No government body or agent such as MPs, Lords, DHSC and MHRA can deal with the questions in that letter without admitting wrongdoing or collusion in the pandemic scam, unless they simply deny it was their fault or responsibility. All of these fucking MPs and Lords voted for everything that happened to you. They are all in on it because of their votes, not matter whether they were witting or unwitting. Their supposed job is not to rubber stamp every steaming turd that gets put in front of them, yet they all did. This makes them all complicit on a defacto basis. If they are stupid or ignorant in their roles and responsibilities, that makes them guilty of what would otherwise be known as gross negligence. They all get away with it because we let them (see Democracy makes all of this our fault, doesn’t it?).

Remember, the contracts and the legislation prove that your government at every level was actively involved in national fraud and worse.

Despite this, Isabel Oakeshott and “journalists” like her have completely ignored what is in the supply contracts. This applies globally. This is not a UK specific thing. The contract terms were confirmed in Brazilian court by Pfizer to be standard in 110 countries. People like Oakeshott - whose partner is Richard Tice, leader of the tiny UK Reform Party - want you to look at a moving, transient and flimsy political target over there while they cover for bigger and make their own political and business manoeuvres over here that enrich themselves and the others they serve within the structure of the G3P; that is their role as stenographers for the G3P, which transcends a given government, party or cabinet.

If you do not understand what a limited hangout is and how Isabel Oakeshott was tasked with creating one via the Telegraph Lockdown Files just ahead of the UK’s COVID “Inquiry”, you do not understand another aspect of how you are fundamentally manipulated on a constant basis. The media is full of this manipulation, which includes predictive programming and Problem, Reaction Solution.

A limited hangout is a tactic used in media relations, perception management, politics, and information management. It originated as a technique in the espionage trade. The tactic involves revealing a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details, to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when one's own sympathies are privately with them, or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous. The term "limited hangout" is also the name of a mysterious website that has haunted the edges of the integrative and meta-sensemaking communities for several years. When it's no longer possible to sustain a phony cover story, dangle some partial truths in public and acknowledge some small, albeit honest, miscues to keep the most damning parts of the truth under wraps.

In Feb 2022 The Ship summarised what was known about the pandemic, what that meant and what would come. 18 months later and every single item and issue in there that was in the pipeline is progressing or has happened. The 99% of the human race has not been able to take control of the slave ship and change its course. If you have abandoned ship somehow, you haven’t helped the rest of humanity because you just fucked off and looked after yourself.

VST gave a clear illustration of the corruption of the NHS via Covid gene therapies and yet now the NHS medics are striking for pay and being hailed as heroes for framing one of their own for murder in an invented internal battle between government NHS management bureaucracy and government NHS medical bureaucracy.

Think about all this. Humans know what is happening to them, why, how and when. And they still let it happen to them, and let it happen to others. They are told, literally, what is coming, what is happening, why and how. They go along with it.

Now do you understand why the 1% see the 99% as cattle?

VST recently reissued The Train to its now larger readership because everything contained within will always be accurate and relevant. It provides an accurate enough and fully workable paradigm for how the Western world actually works. This paradigm can be used to parse information and narrative to understand both and identify causal chains, predict outcomes and build system and cognitive models that can be used for a variety of purposes, subject to ongoing back tests.

Again, The Train shows VST just how wilfully ignorant people are. We have deliberately and repeatedly given the G3P model and this article to people who think they are partially or fully awake and the vast majority of them do not want to analyse, critique and absorb the model to the point they can either consciously and deliberately reject it or accept some or all of it into their way of thinking and test it.

It is no surprise to VST that one of the few places the G3P model was seen was in an AFLDS public event.

Just imagine waking with a fractional memory of a bad dream and being scared, confused and worried. It seemed so real, so vivid, so close to home. Was it a premonition? What did it mean? All you remember was racing through dimly lit tunnels while beasts and monsters swung at you as you whizzed by, people around you screamed in fear, you all plummeted into darkness and there was a huge, freezing splash of water before you woke up in fright.

Your mother tells you that she sat beside you while you slept and heard you talking in your sleep the whole way through. You were dreaming about a wonderful visit to Disneyland and were having fun on all the amusements, rides and games with your friends and the family. You’d all gone together on the park’s biggest, scariest ride and had been excited by the anticipation of all the ride’s surprises. The only bit of the dream you remember was a microcosm - the ride you knew would be scary and was just a ride - that was not, in itself, the integrated meaning of the dream.

That is what The Train and the G3P model is: the integrated framework in which the dark, scary fragment of COVID exists. People post and share piecemeal things but few integrate them into how the system is designed and works, and why the results the system gets are what they are. This integrated, systematic and systemic view of The System i.e. the G3P is what people need to have, but they don’t want it. They don’t want to understand the big picture. This is failure.

To put a rein on an able general while at the same time asking him to suppress a cunning enemy is like tying up the Black Hound of Han and then ordering him to catch elusive hares. What is the difference?
It is in these five matters that the way to victory is known.
Therefore I say: ‘Know the enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles you will never be in peril.
When you are ignorant of the enemy but know yourself, your chances of winning or losing are equal.
If ignorant both of your enemy and of yourself, you are certain in every battle to be in peril.’

Sun Tzu, The Art of War

The Art Of War

6.59MB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Sun Tzu, Clausewitz, And The Importance Of Knowing Yourself And The Enemy

460KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Bill Hicks started out as a comedian but became a philosopher. He understood the dream, the ride, and the big picture. Then he died. If you do not know who Bill Hicks is and have never seen his work, you have missed out. Please correct this deficiency. He is unique.

After the metaphorical articles of The Ship, The Train and An Evening at the Theatre, VST then used simple, simple data in Sweden: A Western Nation That didn't do "everything", got low numbers and are one of the first to call the whole thing off to illustrate how Professor Neil Ferguson was a protected pawn of the G3P model. An earlier, colourful article, It Takes Two, Baby…, had examined how Ferguson had been employed and enabled by the state and his sponsors to fulfil a specific role, had been for years and always will be while sponsored.

In Canary in the Coalmine: All Cause Mortality VST then switched tack and simply laid out a to-date recap of key issues then stated, in literal terms, what those things meant in the most basic and reductive terms. This is still the proven reality today. The human race has, to an unknown extent, over an unknown time, and through unknown numbers of generations, literally fucked itself.

Key excerpts follow:

Joining dots

ACM rises in 2021 onwards coincide with gene therapy rollout.

Causality is being totally ignored by the mainstream press.

A previously unknown amount of professional sports people are being injured or are dying from CV issues and other “causes”.

UK Government data has been shown to possibly employ deliberate miscategorisation of the Unvaxed, “Vaxed after jab 1” and “Vaxed after jab 2”. This miscategorisation skews death into the unvaxed and away from the vaxed.

OAS/ADE/VAIDS indicators are flashing in growing numbers of countries.

MHRA Yellow Card data analysis remains opaque and the MHRA essentially refuses to make it transparent. The MHRA is on the Gates’ payroll to the tune of at least $980,000. The FDA is worse when it comes to direct payments from Big Pharma.

Manufacturers are pressing hard to get the GTs authorised in children. This is a deliberate move to ensure they achieve total immunity from prosecution thanks to US laws that have been flagged by RFK and others.

Covid “cases” are spiking in many territories in patterns that track GT rollout. No explanation of why is being given by authorities or the press. Obvious logic suggests that either:

• GT-induced spike production is triggering infection symptoms (spike is biologically active and toxic); or

• GT-induced spike is being detected by testing regimes, irrespective of whether actual symptomatic disease results; or

• case numbers are being manipulated.

Many countries have bought multiple times the number of population’s worth of doses and they did this upfront, when they couldn’t have known what the dosing and booster schedule was going to be. The dose was only marketed as being two.

Pfizer and FDA have tried to bury the trial documents. Release of 10,000 starts in March, rising to 80,000 in the next release period. This sets a time limit by which Pfizer must achieve immunity from prosecution, depending upon what’s in the documents. All 419,000 pages should be released by between August and October but if there’s bad dirt out sooner (the Pfizer SAE document is bad but not damning) they could be up against a March deadline. Judging by the fact that they are in a full court press on 5-year-olds, I think they are working to a March deadline. If I was them, I would.

GB News in the UK continues to carry increasing amounts of “alternative” viewpoints that have been suppressed from the corporate media and state propaganda outlets, but I haven’t followed it closely enough to see how deep into the technicals they are getting.

BBC Question Time ran a faux “anti-vax” show a couple of days ago. This was always going to be a manipulated propaganda trap and sure enough, it was.

The aviation industry continues to bury its head in the sand about the flight safety threat from gene therapies. More on this to come. The FAA has been put on notice. Other airlines know there are GT-related issues with their pilot staff (either GT-induced injury or death). More than half of pilots in the UK and the USA have been dosed at least one, likely twice. This issue is being deliberately overlooked by the regulators, airlines, unions and national governments.

Drug treatments that are in development or EUA are suspect. Molnupiravir is mutagenic and no testing has been done for the full effects of this in humans. The FDA EUA issuance for it is riddled with problems that Dr. David Wiseman pointed out in detail against the actual FDA EUA assessment session.

Some research is suggesting that the range of damage to the human body that is being detected is akin to radiation exposure.

La Quinta Columna claims to continue its work in analysing the content of vials. I have kept my eye on this since their first report and remain sceptical, but they continue to say serious and worrying things. Judge for yourself. And go to 9 minutes in to this video interview.

Some obvious consequences

If OAS/ADE/VAIDS is real, then it means one simple thing: there could be a lot of people out there on borrowed time. This is going to have massive ramifications for general society if illness in general increases. Cancer rates and metastasis are increasing and changing. Cancer is linked to the innate human immune capability. If that declines, cancer can become naturally unchecked.

If people you love are dosed and continue to be, you may simply have to accept and deal with the possibility that it may be wiser to make the time you spend with them as good as you can make it. If something bad is brewing, it’s likely irreversible.

Do not think or believe that if you are a concerned citizen, you are powerless to act re the above. You can exert pressure as an individual and in groups.

Use the MP letters that are on this substack and email them to your MP, Lords, MHRA and DHSC/Sajid Javid. If you need help with the replies you get from MPs, then please get in touch via comments or directly.

Airline and aviation resources will come in due course.

All that is required for evil to prevail is that good people do nothing.

Be good and do something.

The above remains factually solid and the conclusions drawn from it were accurate and now increasingly proven. Deagel’s forecasts look prescient.

Up to this point, VST was essentially alluding to the impending collapse of society on multiple grounds, notably including the broad spectrum negative health effects of the gene therapies that are going to take very varied timeframes to have their full effects, across almost every layer of society. Meanwhile, more and more gene therapies are being lined up with less and less evidence of safety and testing. Why the fuck is that, given what we all know? This is a literal inversion of sense and the simultaneous lock up of society in postmodernism to the point that people respond to increasing harms and lies not with action but just with digital eyerolling i.e. the rape victim literally never tries to escape even though they are not bound, the basement and the whole house is unlocked and the rapist isn’t home; they just sit about expecting the next attack because that is the new normal narrative they have simply accepted while abandoning their previous empirical sense of right and wrong.

It should be noted that VST has never fallen for the 5G & Graphene Oxide claims that hinge around forms of deliberate graphene-based nanotech being in the gene therapies, whose functionality is activated via exposure to 5G signals. This was a very straightforward situation and remains so now, which has never been adequately identified by its proponents nor tested by them or anyone else.

No one (to VST’s knowledge) who claims to have identified “graphene-based nanotech” in the gene therapies has ever subjected it to any form of functional testing under electromagnetic exposure. Nor have they injected any animals with the products then subjected them to any EM exposure.

As for 5G, EM transmissions on health have been investigated to varying degrees but there appears to be inadequate evidence that how we construct our EM environments isn’t harmful over the duration of a human lifetime. Like much of COVID, the absence of evidence is deliberately, falsely put forward as the evidence of absence. When it comes to the theory that 5G interacts with the COVID gene therapy, is there any research of any kind demonstrating - in any kind of organism - that there is an interaction? An idea in a patent is not evidence of a working technology or proof of these 5G claims. What has sailed by 5G-ers is simply what VST said a long time ago: if you want to surveil everything and everyone all the time, and everything is getting bigger and higher fidelity, then you need more bandwidth. That’s 5G. The “killswitch” is: cutting your internet feed and emotionally fucking up you and your limp-dicked dopamine response; feeding you ever increasing propaganda and BS and limited hangout information to the point of incapacitating overload; collecting evidence of every interaction you have to know you and how you are affected by The System’s techniques of controlling you. When a surveillance system is turned into a closed loop, it becomes a control system.

Remember that there is an information warfare technique that involves spiking a truthful narrative with bullshit to discredit the truth. To work that out, you have to be willing and able to separate out and independently test the bits of the narrative to identify bullshit and truth. This has not been done for 5G and graphene by those who tell you to believe those bits.

Getting back to Canary in the Coalmine: All Cause Mortality, more people continue to die above rolling 5 year average ACM rates across many territories that rolled out gene therapies, and lifespan for many of those people is radically dropping. Therefore, average lifespan is dropping The problem remains exactly as VST expressed in its early dystopic short story, Baseliners - How the war was won. If you took this stuff, do you want to have to face the prospect that you’re fucked because you took it, or do you want to ignore that possibility and carry on in denial? Most people will choose denial such that they work against any efforts to reveal the truth, because otherwise they will have to deal with a horrific (for them) reality. If a point is reached where continued denial of widescale horror is impossible, serious and unpredictable behaviours emerge.

Self-assessment

So far, VST reckons its output on COVID was solid from Nov ‘21 - Feb ‘22. We had a good understanding of a key root cause, we had a working, evidenced big picture view that has stood the test of time and been supported by growing evidence, and we developed and presented a credible working framework that contextualises many of the key actors. We did not jump on a sensationalist bandwagon. We thought ahead from the very beginning (autoimmunity) and asked what does this mean? This manifested in ACM and we understood, in its worse(r) forms, that it meant significant societal collapse through hugely decreased human lifespans and increasing sudden deaths at any age.

We explained to readers, politically, the basic integrated situation the 99% and the aware minority were in. This remains true today and VST’s observations that the 99% is utterly inept remains true. The human race is on a ride - a slave ship - and it’s shown it is incapable of stopping or taking over that ship. Meanwhile, the 1% are on a luxury train, going where they want to go, and no one they pass has the skill or wherewithal to blow the train’s tracks, even though now they all know where the train is going and why.

People got put in ships and trains to be sent to bad places before.

They didn’t get off or fight their way out then either.

Now you know why.