Wise words… I’ve fallen for it many times and am only just starting to wise up. The last straw was seeing how easily I was being manipulated by Twitter… so that had to go. We’ve lived all our lives with the hero/villain narrative and ‘they’ know this. I have seen how easily I have been manipulated over time and you’re dead right… step away and refuse to play. If I express dissent in a conversation with a particular narrative my interlocutor immediately assumes I’m pro the opposing side… not true… I trust neither ‘side’ because they’re two cheeks of the same arse…
I more frequently move to asking irreducibly simple questions if I can identify one e.g. If born before 1980 with only 4-5 single Vax doses & lifespan ~82, why would anyone need more shots? None will make you live longer. Compare Vax schedule post 1980 esp post 2005 (USA 60-90 shots).
Similarly, if life was rich & full pre SocMed due normal interactions and information being of high qual & depth, what true benefit/advantage does SocMed actually bring to life? It's easy to answer "zero" when you at it like that and abandon it.
No one actually gives a real shit about your inner monologue (or most of it) hence "INNER MONOLOGUE". same for curated view of life/kids transmitted into public that become "worthless" if anyone can access, vs privacy and targeted sharing with people who want that access to your intimate life (real friends, family as permost human history). Why post your children's images on the we? Are they even consenting? Etc. Future issues? Possibly many.
All of these things operate on "you're the product, convenience model" free use i.e. The data robbery con. You can leave that panopticon. The door is open.
The world exists. The binary of computation doesn't with permanence but will permanently affect you. Under these models, they negatively affect you and the network.
I've used X for not long to examine the platform and what it does to perception interaction etc from my perspective and to test my previously published theories. 95+% of X is junk. I stand by my published theories and evidence that supports then continues to appear over time.
It's a deeply toxic digital socmed construct, even though there's comms utility in there. IMO, it needs massive, fundamental upending overhaul.
I've an idea for this that i may try to give to Assange for him as Wikileaks 2+ that goes way beyond WL + SocMed that inverts the data cost/ownership/profit model while dealing with the issues that affected him as WL journo and head guy.
SocMed has clearly turned humans binary, as you observe (like, don't like). But when you think about it, at core we resolve to binary in the flesh, which was a concept i was exploring in drafts of The Child Inside.
Do, Do not
Act, don't act
Breathe in, breathe out
0,1
Plus, if you think about human computer/internet interaction, humans are being manipulated directly by an analogue binary to digital binary to analogue binary conversion process.
Everything you are looking at is actually just 1 or zero. Including porn. Conceptually, I find that obvious but not quite that obvious, and I've never met anyone who voiced that observation. I've little doubt someone said or wrote it already, but I just haven't seen it put that way.
Even an arse is binary as you basically state. Cheek zero, cheek 1 (yes, there's arguably another "zero" in there but let's keep this simple and symmetric).
Ultimately, you're either with us or against us. Ever was it thus for the human tribe.
Until more people recognise these things are mostly staged events, their outrage will be misdirected.
How likely is some random kid getting a taxi (and not paying for it) to a quiet residential street, only to walk directly up a secluded driveway to a set of stairs leading to the upper floor where a room is used for a childrens yoga class, and start stabbing up said kids? This could only happen if a script is being followed.
Cue hords of thugs arriving in convoy from "all over the country" to meet a bunch of already waiting cops in riot gear outside a mosque.
Cue at least 15 copy cat protests across the country, with copycat police response.
Cue staged counter protests with professionally focus grouped messaging, professionally printed before hand all ready for it.
Cue multiple 'go fund me' campaigns to pay the crisis actors. Cue 'SouthportStrong' hashtags etc. etc. all on cue.
If you're outrage is triggered that anyone could entertain these thoughts and you're clutching your "think of the children" pearls, go watch Richard Halls 3 part deconstruction documentry of the Manchester false flag event "Manchester: Night of the Bang" where he conclusively proves it was a staged false flag event. Then go read Iain Davis coverage of the bizzare High Court case where the likely result will be to make asking these questions completely illegal.
What we can't yet say due lack of info/publicly released evidence is why the perpetrator acted, so any motive assignation is only speculatory in the absence of data.
By way of parallel, but with reference to history, some keywords to be open-minded about might include:
MKULTRA
COINTELPRO
CHAOS
GLADIO
FBI DOMESTIC TERROR
All of which are anchored in the admitted and proven historical record. They may have nothing to do with Southport conceptually or otherwise.
Equally, mental illness and bizarre/unimaginable are all valid considerations. Also, truth can be stranger than fiction.
Aspects of Occam's & Hanlon's razors can be factors to consider sometimes.
Recent British history contains the tragic murder of David Amess MP. The perpetrator was classified as a terrorist.
Make of that report what you will. That perpetrator's reported motive/testimony is beyond my ability to have imagined because I know nothing of the perpetrator etc, so I remain neutral with regard to the motive of the Southport perpetrator and the mechanics of the crime's execution. "Don't know so don't assume" is what I select.
In the context of this article, the motive and the mechanics are outside the scope of how the event was subsequently "used", for want of a better word, by any actors for whatever ends, be that citizens or the state.
The genesis of an event and how it gets used by others are separate but can be conjoined. In my experience, that's an important dichotomy/juxtaposition/separation/contradiction that is useful (if sometimes tricky/uncomfortable) to hold in mind, especially in the absence of solid information/evidence. Hence why this article is not concerned with the genesis or execution of the Southport attack. Basically, it's out of scope.
Re Manchester, declassifieduk.org has serious reporting about possible state level cover up that you might find of interest that may track with or contradict the POVs you mention. I'm not familiar with them. Thanks for sharing.
Agree we can't say with absoloute certainty re Southport, there will never be enough evidence either way, the scene was too controlled to allow evidence to escape, unlike Manchester, where only the city room was the completely controlled scene, "casualties" later visited by the Queen can clearly be seen running about in open source footage, one specific "casualty" that supposidly had shrapnel blown through her thigh can be seen casually trotting about on high heels minuites after the alleged blast.
The social engineering does follow the same MO though.
Declassified seem very limited hengouty, look at their output on 'climate change' for example.
Watch Halls doc then compare to Declassifieds Manchester output, it's obvious Abedi is an intel service assett. Witnesses saw him running away before the bang, recoded police radio proves the police let him go after they stopped him in the getaway vehicle, the cover-up is not that he was a trained by UK terrorist and people need to answer for that, the cover-up is that the whole thing was staged.
There will be a form of certainty from the trial of Southport based on the perpetrator's testimony. Trial scheduled circa 2025. Re Amess, despite terrorism classification, trial reporting was published. It could have been heard in camera and DSMA Noticed into secrecy. It seems it wasn't, if you accept the reporting.
Yup, I spend up to three hours a day reading from the platform - not necessarily from suscribed authors - plus other miscellaneous sources such as the Daily Sceptic and Brownstone Institute. And then I try to find some time to write something on Stack and on my (French-language) blog.
BTW my extensive subscriptions were recently cut down to a half since I have little patience for those who can't or won't see through such a blatant psyop as the Butler shooting range. I wrote about that [shameless plug alert] in one of my (few) articles, which I'm currently writing a follow-up to as we speak, very much in line with your here article. I confess to stealing your Thatcher quote in the process :-/
Yes I particularly like what you said about why people suddenly 'care' about people they have no tangible connection with. Part of he globalist strategy is to brainwash the public into holding the view that some random person in a country you couldn't before pinpoint on map is now more important to you than your own child, brother or elderly mother. This is blatant nonsense as by definition nature loss after its own. People only wake up to this when they are really poor, ie hungry and work out then whose mouth is the most important to feed. This is why the over privileged 'liberal' (anything but) elites love globalism because they do not understand that only wealth allows them to care about shit which poverty does not have the luxury to entertain. Starve a liberal elite for a couple of weeks and watch how quickly their open arms fold in and they become the most brutal beasts of all, far more brutal than your average so called 'far right' thug. https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/what-next?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1eq51l
"The mob looks left and right but it never, ever looks up."
I put something similar in my Twitter X bio just before they took my account down, but it was probably a collage I made with 'oligarchs pulling the strings of those placard holders' that got me reported on my main & backup account too...
So the party of 'change' quickly transforms the UK into a police state, employing the state apparatus to target regime critics, while actual criminals get off lightly. They give pay rises to bribe the public-sector & loyal unions, but the marginalised white working-class become the scapegoats of this new dystopia...
Those supposedly anti-fascist groups have long been co-opted... Hope-not-Hate's links to intelligence agencies are well documented, and Socialist Worker were part of a campaign to push covid shots to the developing world for reasons of equity (paid for by Western taxpayers).
Excellent post, thank you.
Wise words… I’ve fallen for it many times and am only just starting to wise up. The last straw was seeing how easily I was being manipulated by Twitter… so that had to go. We’ve lived all our lives with the hero/villain narrative and ‘they’ know this. I have seen how easily I have been manipulated over time and you’re dead right… step away and refuse to play. If I express dissent in a conversation with a particular narrative my interlocutor immediately assumes I’m pro the opposing side… not true… I trust neither ‘side’ because they’re two cheeks of the same arse…
I more frequently move to asking irreducibly simple questions if I can identify one e.g. If born before 1980 with only 4-5 single Vax doses & lifespan ~82, why would anyone need more shots? None will make you live longer. Compare Vax schedule post 1980 esp post 2005 (USA 60-90 shots).
Similarly, if life was rich & full pre SocMed due normal interactions and information being of high qual & depth, what true benefit/advantage does SocMed actually bring to life? It's easy to answer "zero" when you at it like that and abandon it.
No one actually gives a real shit about your inner monologue (or most of it) hence "INNER MONOLOGUE". same for curated view of life/kids transmitted into public that become "worthless" if anyone can access, vs privacy and targeted sharing with people who want that access to your intimate life (real friends, family as permost human history). Why post your children's images on the we? Are they even consenting? Etc. Future issues? Possibly many.
All of these things operate on "you're the product, convenience model" free use i.e. The data robbery con. You can leave that panopticon. The door is open.
The world exists. The binary of computation doesn't with permanence but will permanently affect you. Under these models, they negatively affect you and the network.
I've used X for not long to examine the platform and what it does to perception interaction etc from my perspective and to test my previously published theories. 95+% of X is junk. I stand by my published theories and evidence that supports then continues to appear over time.
It's a deeply toxic digital socmed construct, even though there's comms utility in there. IMO, it needs massive, fundamental upending overhaul.
I've an idea for this that i may try to give to Assange for him as Wikileaks 2+ that goes way beyond WL + SocMed that inverts the data cost/ownership/profit model while dealing with the issues that affected him as WL journo and head guy.
SocMed has clearly turned humans binary, as you observe (like, don't like). But when you think about it, at core we resolve to binary in the flesh, which was a concept i was exploring in drafts of The Child Inside.
Do, Do not
Act, don't act
Breathe in, breathe out
0,1
Plus, if you think about human computer/internet interaction, humans are being manipulated directly by an analogue binary to digital binary to analogue binary conversion process.
Everything you are looking at is actually just 1 or zero. Including porn. Conceptually, I find that obvious but not quite that obvious, and I've never met anyone who voiced that observation. I've little doubt someone said or wrote it already, but I just haven't seen it put that way.
Even an arse is binary as you basically state. Cheek zero, cheek 1 (yes, there's arguably another "zero" in there but let's keep this simple and symmetric).
Ultimately, you're either with us or against us. Ever was it thus for the human tribe.
Until more people recognise these things are mostly staged events, their outrage will be misdirected.
How likely is some random kid getting a taxi (and not paying for it) to a quiet residential street, only to walk directly up a secluded driveway to a set of stairs leading to the upper floor where a room is used for a childrens yoga class, and start stabbing up said kids? This could only happen if a script is being followed.
Cue hords of thugs arriving in convoy from "all over the country" to meet a bunch of already waiting cops in riot gear outside a mosque.
Cue at least 15 copy cat protests across the country, with copycat police response.
Cue staged counter protests with professionally focus grouped messaging, professionally printed before hand all ready for it.
Cue multiple 'go fund me' campaigns to pay the crisis actors. Cue 'SouthportStrong' hashtags etc. etc. all on cue.
https://gab.com/groups/66505
If you're outrage is triggered that anyone could entertain these thoughts and you're clutching your "think of the children" pearls, go watch Richard Halls 3 part deconstruction documentry of the Manchester false flag event "Manchester: Night of the Bang" where he conclusively proves it was a staged false flag event. Then go read Iain Davis coverage of the bizzare High Court case where the likely result will be to make asking these questions completely illegal.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/manchester-the-night-of-the-bang-richard-d-hall/
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall
What we can't yet say due lack of info/publicly released evidence is why the perpetrator acted, so any motive assignation is only speculatory in the absence of data.
By way of parallel, but with reference to history, some keywords to be open-minded about might include:
MKULTRA
COINTELPRO
CHAOS
GLADIO
FBI DOMESTIC TERROR
All of which are anchored in the admitted and proven historical record. They may have nothing to do with Southport conceptually or otherwise.
Equally, mental illness and bizarre/unimaginable are all valid considerations. Also, truth can be stranger than fiction.
Aspects of Occam's & Hanlon's razors can be factors to consider sometimes.
Recent British history contains the tragic murder of David Amess MP. The perpetrator was classified as a terrorist.
The BBC reported on the case:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-essex-61026210
Make of that report what you will. That perpetrator's reported motive/testimony is beyond my ability to have imagined because I know nothing of the perpetrator etc, so I remain neutral with regard to the motive of the Southport perpetrator and the mechanics of the crime's execution. "Don't know so don't assume" is what I select.
In the context of this article, the motive and the mechanics are outside the scope of how the event was subsequently "used", for want of a better word, by any actors for whatever ends, be that citizens or the state.
The genesis of an event and how it gets used by others are separate but can be conjoined. In my experience, that's an important dichotomy/juxtaposition/separation/contradiction that is useful (if sometimes tricky/uncomfortable) to hold in mind, especially in the absence of solid information/evidence. Hence why this article is not concerned with the genesis or execution of the Southport attack. Basically, it's out of scope.
Re Manchester, declassifieduk.org has serious reporting about possible state level cover up that you might find of interest that may track with or contradict the POVs you mention. I'm not familiar with them. Thanks for sharing.
Agree we can't say with absoloute certainty re Southport, there will never be enough evidence either way, the scene was too controlled to allow evidence to escape, unlike Manchester, where only the city room was the completely controlled scene, "casualties" later visited by the Queen can clearly be seen running about in open source footage, one specific "casualty" that supposidly had shrapnel blown through her thigh can be seen casually trotting about on high heels minuites after the alleged blast.
The social engineering does follow the same MO though.
Declassified seem very limited hengouty, look at their output on 'climate change' for example.
Watch Halls doc then compare to Declassifieds Manchester output, it's obvious Abedi is an intel service assett. Witnesses saw him running away before the bang, recoded police radio proves the police let him go after they stopped him in the getaway vehicle, the cover-up is not that he was a trained by UK terrorist and people need to answer for that, the cover-up is that the whole thing was staged.
There will be a form of certainty from the trial of Southport based on the perpetrator's testimony. Trial scheduled circa 2025. Re Amess, despite terrorism classification, trial reporting was published. It could have been heard in camera and DSMA Noticed into secrecy. It seems it wasn't, if you accept the reporting.
Most thoughtful article I've read so far on Substack. Re-stacked.
Considering your extensive subscriptions, that's quite the compliment. Assuming you read much of what you subscribe to! :)
Thanks a lot. Always nice to be complimented.
Yup, I spend up to three hours a day reading from the platform - not necessarily from suscribed authors - plus other miscellaneous sources such as the Daily Sceptic and Brownstone Institute. And then I try to find some time to write something on Stack and on my (French-language) blog.
BTW my extensive subscriptions were recently cut down to a half since I have little patience for those who can't or won't see through such a blatant psyop as the Butler shooting range. I wrote about that [shameless plug alert] in one of my (few) articles, which I'm currently writing a follow-up to as we speak, very much in line with your here article. I confess to stealing your Thatcher quote in the process :-/
Yes I particularly like what you said about why people suddenly 'care' about people they have no tangible connection with. Part of he globalist strategy is to brainwash the public into holding the view that some random person in a country you couldn't before pinpoint on map is now more important to you than your own child, brother or elderly mother. This is blatant nonsense as by definition nature loss after its own. People only wake up to this when they are really poor, ie hungry and work out then whose mouth is the most important to feed. This is why the over privileged 'liberal' (anything but) elites love globalism because they do not understand that only wealth allows them to care about shit which poverty does not have the luxury to entertain. Starve a liberal elite for a couple of weeks and watch how quickly their open arms fold in and they become the most brutal beasts of all, far more brutal than your average so called 'far right' thug. https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/what-next?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1eq51l
"The mob looks left and right but it never, ever looks up."
I put something similar in my Twitter X bio just before they took my account down, but it was probably a collage I made with 'oligarchs pulling the strings of those placard holders' that got me reported on my main & backup account too...
So the party of 'change' quickly transforms the UK into a police state, employing the state apparatus to target regime critics, while actual criminals get off lightly. They give pay rises to bribe the public-sector & loyal unions, but the marginalised white working-class become the scapegoats of this new dystopia...
Those supposedly anti-fascist groups have long been co-opted... Hope-not-Hate's links to intelligence agencies are well documented, and Socialist Worker were part of a campaign to push covid shots to the developing world for reasons of equity (paid for by Western taxpayers).
NHS employees, public sector workers and unions were all essential to manipulating the nation to go along with Covid, while destroying the nhs