It could also be, for those children that still did get born, more sterility comes in the next generation. Because that was how Gates' "Gene drive" concept in mosquitoes was supposed to work. In the mosquitoes, it allegedly also alters lifespan in next generation I believe. That was supposed to be an advantage as then they would die prior to the phase in their life where they are harmful and transmit disease.
As should the number of opportunities we give them to do this, then. Aim at unusable results as often as one may still be forced to endure the procedure (potentially under the who regime if it should come). Someone called it the "nasal assaults" or "attacks". Good to term them that way.
I’ve worked for the rich. Mostly inherited wealth. They ain’t too bright in most cases.
So riddle me this... what happens to all those nuclear reactors once the engineers die off? Plus the myriad of other systems that I’m not considering right now...
I guess ruling over an irradiated wasteland is still ruling?
This spreads deaths out into lots of categories re time and type, across society.
When big systems start to get critical, they can be reduced appropriately as a normal management function e.g. Shuttering reactors as staff reduce and/or demand goes down.
Hard to spitball everything but compare:
Car crashes due incapacitation/death
Air crashes due same
Nuclear meltdowns due same
I feel most threatened by cars then planes then nukes.
The car has zero safety element. The plane had more (in multi pilot commercial operations, not single pilot rec/commercial). The nuke has a lot of staff, lots of stability, reasonable time scales.
You only need one driver to stroke out at 70mph on the highway to cause a major incident. There's loads of drivers who could go through that. You can see vehicle crashes due to it on https://t.me/VaccineInjuriesca
Deagal could be right. Not sure how long it'll take till the numbers become irrefutable, but the world will be a strange place by then.
I never took the juice so I’ll watch from the sidelines. I did have a few weeks a couple years ago of brain fog from what I assume was shedding. Eventually got Corona which was a 3 day headache.
I’m not exactly sure what will happen but I’ve remained healthy even though my extended circle has been decimated via illness, cancer, sudden death...
I’m in Ireland. Excess deaths are off the chart. But they’re filling the country with foreigners to paper the cracks.
I sit back and observe. Most people I know write me off as a crank. So be it...
A commenter on another stack pointed out another problem with the nuclear power plants.
The many large cooling ponds for the spent nuclear waste will overheat and melt down when they are no longer being kept cooled. They will all be as bad a reactor melt down too.
The only and best hope is to avoid all big pharma drugs, vaccines and mRNA injections...PERIOD! None of the modern medical establishment can be trusted. And for sure and for certain, all the elitists, arrogant masters and pretend "important" anti-humans will perish along with the rest of us. None of these clowns will live in the world they envision. They are going to die too!.
If I'm honest, I don't agree. I think humanity is too far behind the curve to deal with root cause and do what's necessary. The elite will retain most of their advantage.
How strange though, they've been playing this game for a long time.
I understand there was a final resolve planned but still, the game has
been highly engaging and advanterous for multiple generations of powerful entities, so what now? Probably won't change much for them. I agree with you, especially considering (imo) that they will be left with plenty to play with and conquer (Asia, Afrika etc) so
the game isn't over yet. It seems that majority of demoralised and docile populations are in for changes most aren't able to comprehend yet.
If you literally do not read or hear what we are talking about here, what would your world look like? If no one you actually knew was obviously injured by GTs, and/or they told you and themselves it was COVID or unrelated, and you unquestioningly believed it, what would your life be like? It would be largely unperturbed save for the major socioeconomic factors and big narratives facing all. Your version of the Matrix would be glitch free.
You'll see someone who entirely believes the BBC's output on Lucy Letby, then declares it accurate compared to all other sources. When then presented with another source of analysis based on primary information, they say,
"I don’t generally trust the word of a random website I’ve never heard of, but thanks."
To which, I replied:
"Here's a new study on the effects of paracetamol in adult humans. It's groundbreaking."
"I don't read studies I've never heard of before."
"OK. You know that study you just heard of about paracetamol?"
"Yes"
"Here's a new study on the effects of paracetamol in adult humans."
Their reply:
"Let me rephrase: I do not trust random anonymous sources which anyone could write. You are being disingenuous to suggest that is the same as a peer reviewed publicised article from a legitimate source. I will not be continuing this conversation, thanks."
This is an self-generated, self-persisting, informational and intellectual doom loop that has been baked in through heavy conditioning. It is proof of learned helplessness, mental capture, intellectual fecklessness, zero curiosity, zero cynicism towards approved sources, zero awareness of one's own bias, and more.
This is common. It has nothing to do with IQ or actual or self-perceived or self-declared or even third party assumptions about intelligence. People displaying all of the above are flying your commercial jets and some of them are dying at the controls, and they are filling your hospitals, killing and helping people. And they are filling every form of public and private service.
The changes these people will experience will be broadly managed via the narrative they expose themselves to an subscribe to. Thus, they WILL comprehend and accept the necessary changes that the narrative is telling them and conditioning them to accept as necessary.
It is only those who have taken the red pill who struggle.
You absolutely making a strong point here and I have to agree.
We assess others by our own norms and beliefs, so (obviously) my thinking there was limited and showing (also, maybe somewhere there
there is a desperate want to believe that it can not be that bad despite all the signs of affirmation). It is like a live stream to observe human behaviour on a scale previously reserved to behavioral scientists and philosophers lol. Still, I hope some will "crack" eventually, hopefully sooner than later. Otherwise there will be too many pieces to pick up.
Still, frustrating and upsetting as it is, can we really blame them? And for what? For allowing themselves to be brainwashed? For wanting to live their lives their way? For not having the minds to see through all of that manipulation and lies? I would venture to say that most never had it in them to think critically. There was a time that I seriously thought that just basic survival instinct will "kick in" and people will wake up, but, as you said the decades long (even generational) conditioning has taken over.
Thank you very much for replying and thank you for all your post,
Don't read the plot on this CIApaedo-ia page. I just give you the link for disambiguation purposes. Should be available on some streaming service or BT for those so inclined.
What the elite coke-head is describing is an immune response dominated by IgG4, the tolerance antibody. As I understand it, were the immune response to a viral infection to be dominated by IgG4, i.e. immune tolerance, the presentation would be sudden organ failure. The organs fail because the virus replicates unopposed by the immune system, destroying the cells of the organs until one or more essential organs cease to function.
The immune system would not mount it's normal response to a virus. That means infected people who have an immune tolerance response wouldn't show symptoms of sickness. They wouldn't be sniffling, coughing, headachey, feverish, etc. They would appear well. Until they developed symptoms of organ failure. And died.
No future super strain is needed. Current strains of COVID currently circulating would be deadly for someone with an IgG4 dominated immune tolerance response. If there were 3 billion people that already had immune tolerance responses to COVID, they would already be dying rapidly and in very large numbers. That isn't happening right now, therefore high IgG4 levels cannot already be the case in a large fraction of the population, much less in 3 billion people.
If it is the plan of the depopulation cabal to use IgG4 immune tolerance to do the killing, then they have no need to release a new strain. Existing strains would do the job. If widespread actual immune tolerance to COVID were to develop, which it hasn't and we don't know if it will, all the cabal would have to do is wait for people die from the currently circulating COVID strains.
Thanks for your input and contribution. We'll circle back round to this soon. Within months this scenario will have played out if there's any real and significantly widespread new strain infections.
If only there were more citizen funding of specific research projects covering various aspects of testing e.g. immunological, genetic sequencing etc.
The fecklessness of the human race is its guaranteed ruination at the hands of motivated minority who simply acts and keeps iterating their actions.
For all the "awake" with their collective will, skills and resources, they can barely string together a project amongst themselves and even then, only piecemeal, small scale, often born out of pure self-interest and as a result of personal trauma.
You may be interested in the work of Geert Vanden Bossche. He's predicted the evolution of the virus into a highly virulent variant which will be a serious danger to the highly vaccinated. I find his hypothesis plausible.
Dr Rennebohm's 1 hr video summarizing Geert's book:
I've paid scant attention to GVB for no particular reason and that's not because I've discounted him. I'll revisit. I was aware of his opposition to mass vaccination in a pandemic, immune escape etc.
The evolution of new variants is ongoing. Some variants are likely to be more dangerous. The appearance of a new strain that is widespread and dangerous is not confirmation of the coke-head's scenario. The unique identifying feature of the coke-head's scenario is the media psyop, one clearly aimed to implicate governments and turn the people against their leaders.
But if that's the primary/a high order aim/feature of Coke-Head's Theorem, what does that bring that isn't already there from the current state of affairs? The entire mechanics of the virus and gene therapy scenario is now largely binary - natural virus of threat needed rapid approach that could've been risky for some to get back to normal vs. genetic engineering driving harmful outcomes for spectrum of possible profit and control motives. It's pretty much a simple dichotomy where you don't get people subscribing from the latter to the former i.e. it's a one way street. Those who red pill literally can't ever blue pill.
Adding in "and another thing, they did something/added another easter egg that's even worse" doesn't exacerbate the pre-existing dichotomy.
There are already many easter eggs built in, in plain sight.
Moderna's does is 3x Pfizer's. No explanation of why it was 100ug is given, even on a self-contained reactogenicity basis by Moderna. Pfizer acknowledged they got a read on 10ug then set at 30ug but did not explain why. The question is not "why is M's X and P's is Y?" because the answer is always "we didn't have anything to do with the other, so ask them about theirs", as Gerrard Rennick (dumbly) discovered several times when he kept asking this stupid question to which he already knew the answer. He should have just asked, "why did you set your dose at Xug?" and then, with both companies' answer in hand, others could cross compare and evaluate.
That easter egg is as valuable and technical as "what else is in this shit?", "where does this shit go?", "how long does this shit last?" etc. Each of these questions are also easter eggs and, as they are being answered, anyone coming into contact with the answers is forced to scrape a bit more red pill into their mouths.
In this way, I'm not sure I view either EoH hypothesis as completely artificial psyops, although I fully recognise the high price and risk that comes with publicly looking at and trying to evaluate them, given their source and nature.
Trouble is, the first EoHH can now be said to be partially proven in terms of stealth payload and cancer links, while the germ cell, specific gene interaction and RT mechanism are yet to be analysed and proven. But pending human genetic sequencing may actually shed light on these areas. Stay tuned on this. Buckhaults PhD has said he is going to look, and McKernan is also on the case. Something else of import may also finally be analysed that could be another big piece of the puzzle.
For the record my reason for not getting juiced was that my aunt died about 6 hours of getting her second dose of Moderna. The punchline being she was told at her previous medical a couple months prior by her physician that she had and I quote ‘a five star heart’. She was cremated by the authorities despite my uncle’s protests for an autopsy... nothing to see here...
I am deeply sorry to hear this. My sincere condolences. No one should be subjected to such treatment and no one should have to learn a lesson/form a decision based on such a trauma. You are describing literal crimes.
Forgive me for saying, but have you:
1. filed your own YC and VAERS reports?
2. discussed filing criminal complaints against the medic re the advice, the injury and informed consent issues, and the state's action to deny autopsy and cremate?
3. filed a request for a VDPS payment due to her passing as a result of gene therapy injury?
Coke-Head's Theorem brings nothing useful to the decision making process. If I believe him, then I am demoralized because I am then a sitting duck regardless of whether I got the vax or not.
From that perspective, Coke-Head's Theorem IS the psyop. The only actionable remedy for his scenario is if you are un-vaxxed and can take up permanent residence at an off-grid bug-out shelter. The vast majority of people either don't have a bug-out shelter or could not contrive one on such short notice. That leaves most people helpless, and demoralized, waiting for the end. So, no benefit and significant cost to believing him.
If I dis-believe him, there is no penalty. If I am one of the few who has a bug-out shelter, then I am going to be on alert anyway and I don't need his story to tell me it's time to go. If I don't have a bug-out shelter, then I cant take action anyway. Same reasoning for preppers who plan to shelter-in-place.
Because his story isn't plausible to start with, and because it's demoralizing, my guess is that the story originates from the cabal and it's purpose is to make people believe that "resistance is futile" and "stop fighting us, you'll never win anyway". All the more reason to dis-believe such stories. They aren't helpful. The more people believe such stories the more people will cease resisting and the more advantage shifts to the cabal.
An interesting story. I do think that when the damage done is realized and if there is no hopeful cure available, the ill will contemplate how to punish the perps. Terminally ill people don't have much to lose. It's entirely possible there could be a creative retaliation such as the one you described. I wonder if perhaps the cabal was counting on the ill dying quickly, before retaliation could be wrought.
It could also be, for those children that still did get born, more sterility comes in the next generation. Because that was how Gates' "Gene drive" concept in mosquitoes was supposed to work. In the mosquitoes, it allegedly also alters lifespan in next generation I believe. That was supposed to be an advantage as then they would die prior to the phase in their life where they are harmful and transmit disease.
Correct.
Genetic integration with germ cells affecting offspring could result in fertility issues in offspring that persist.
Hence the long standing need to sequence the genome of:
Uninfected, undosed
Infected, undosed
Uninfected, dosed
Infected, dosed
Lucky that the price and time for doing this had dropped to the floor, isn't it?
As should the number of opportunities we give them to do this, then. Aim at unusable results as often as one may still be forced to endure the procedure (potentially under the who regime if it should come). Someone called it the "nasal assaults" or "attacks". Good to term them that way.
So there’s a chance Deagel may have been right.
I’ve worked for the rich. Mostly inherited wealth. They ain’t too bright in most cases.
So riddle me this... what happens to all those nuclear reactors once the engineers die off? Plus the myriad of other systems that I’m not considering right now...
I guess ruling over an irradiated wasteland is still ruling?
Imagine...
Mixed mode of action when it comes to death:
Unannounced, sudden (CV/stroke);
Short notice (clots)
Rapid onset (turbo cancer)
Chronic (wide spectrum autoimmune diseases, VAIDS vulnerabilities)
This spreads deaths out into lots of categories re time and type, across society.
When big systems start to get critical, they can be reduced appropriately as a normal management function e.g. Shuttering reactors as staff reduce and/or demand goes down.
Hard to spitball everything but compare:
Car crashes due incapacitation/death
Air crashes due same
Nuclear meltdowns due same
I feel most threatened by cars then planes then nukes.
The car has zero safety element. The plane had more (in multi pilot commercial operations, not single pilot rec/commercial). The nuke has a lot of staff, lots of stability, reasonable time scales.
You only need one driver to stroke out at 70mph on the highway to cause a major incident. There's loads of drivers who could go through that. You can see vehicle crashes due to it on https://t.me/VaccineInjuriesca
Deagal could be right. Not sure how long it'll take till the numbers become irrefutable, but the world will be a strange place by then.
I never took the juice so I’ll watch from the sidelines. I did have a few weeks a couple years ago of brain fog from what I assume was shedding. Eventually got Corona which was a 3 day headache.
I’m not exactly sure what will happen but I’ve remained healthy even though my extended circle has been decimated via illness, cancer, sudden death...
I’m in Ireland. Excess deaths are off the chart. But they’re filling the country with foreigners to paper the cracks.
I sit back and observe. Most people I know write me off as a crank. So be it...
A commenter on another stack pointed out another problem with the nuclear power plants.
The many large cooling ponds for the spent nuclear waste will overheat and melt down when they are no longer being kept cooled. They will all be as bad a reactor melt down too.
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/safer-storage-spent-nuclear-fuel
The only and best hope is to avoid all big pharma drugs, vaccines and mRNA injections...PERIOD! None of the modern medical establishment can be trusted. And for sure and for certain, all the elitists, arrogant masters and pretend "important" anti-humans will perish along with the rest of us. None of these clowns will live in the world they envision. They are going to die too!.
If I'm honest, I don't agree. I think humanity is too far behind the curve to deal with root cause and do what's necessary. The elite will retain most of their advantage.
How strange though, they've been playing this game for a long time.
I understand there was a final resolve planned but still, the game has
been highly engaging and advanterous for multiple generations of powerful entities, so what now? Probably won't change much for them. I agree with you, especially considering (imo) that they will be left with plenty to play with and conquer (Asia, Afrika etc) so
the game isn't over yet. It seems that majority of demoralised and docile populations are in for changes most aren't able to comprehend yet.
If you literally do not read or hear what we are talking about here, what would your world look like? If no one you actually knew was obviously injured by GTs, and/or they told you and themselves it was COVID or unrelated, and you unquestioningly believed it, what would your life be like? It would be largely unperturbed save for the major socioeconomic factors and big narratives facing all. Your version of the Matrix would be glitch free.
Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.
Ever was it thus.
See this example in a tweet thread.
https://twitter.com/the_gingerone/status/1692863507014832329
You'll see someone who entirely believes the BBC's output on Lucy Letby, then declares it accurate compared to all other sources. When then presented with another source of analysis based on primary information, they say,
"I don’t generally trust the word of a random website I’ve never heard of, but thanks."
To which, I replied:
"Here's a new study on the effects of paracetamol in adult humans. It's groundbreaking."
"I don't read studies I've never heard of before."
"OK. You know that study you just heard of about paracetamol?"
"Yes"
"Here's a new study on the effects of paracetamol in adult humans."
Their reply:
"Let me rephrase: I do not trust random anonymous sources which anyone could write. You are being disingenuous to suggest that is the same as a peer reviewed publicised article from a legitimate source. I will not be continuing this conversation, thanks."
This is an self-generated, self-persisting, informational and intellectual doom loop that has been baked in through heavy conditioning. It is proof of learned helplessness, mental capture, intellectual fecklessness, zero curiosity, zero cynicism towards approved sources, zero awareness of one's own bias, and more.
This is common. It has nothing to do with IQ or actual or self-perceived or self-declared or even third party assumptions about intelligence. People displaying all of the above are flying your commercial jets and some of them are dying at the controls, and they are filling your hospitals, killing and helping people. And they are filling every form of public and private service.
The changes these people will experience will be broadly managed via the narrative they expose themselves to an subscribe to. Thus, they WILL comprehend and accept the necessary changes that the narrative is telling them and conditioning them to accept as necessary.
It is only those who have taken the red pill who struggle.
You absolutely making a strong point here and I have to agree.
We assess others by our own norms and beliefs, so (obviously) my thinking there was limited and showing (also, maybe somewhere there
there is a desperate want to believe that it can not be that bad despite all the signs of affirmation). It is like a live stream to observe human behaviour on a scale previously reserved to behavioral scientists and philosophers lol. Still, I hope some will "crack" eventually, hopefully sooner than later. Otherwise there will be too many pieces to pick up.
Still, frustrating and upsetting as it is, can we really blame them? And for what? For allowing themselves to be brainwashed? For wanting to live their lives their way? For not having the minds to see through all of that manipulation and lies? I would venture to say that most never had it in them to think critically. There was a time that I seriously thought that just basic survival instinct will "kick in" and people will wake up, but, as you said the decades long (even generational) conditioning has taken over.
Thank you very much for replying and thank you for all your post,
I greatly appreciate it.
I've got a feeling you will enjoy/be entertained by a film called Nine Days.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Days_(film)
Don't read the plot on this CIApaedo-ia page. I just give you the link for disambiguation purposes. Should be available on some streaming service or BT for those so inclined.
See what you think.
Thank you, will do :-))
That 180 deg. twist in the psyop -- interesting. We should know soon enough.
Thank you !
The coke-head's scenario is not plausible.
What the elite coke-head is describing is an immune response dominated by IgG4, the tolerance antibody. As I understand it, were the immune response to a viral infection to be dominated by IgG4, i.e. immune tolerance, the presentation would be sudden organ failure. The organs fail because the virus replicates unopposed by the immune system, destroying the cells of the organs until one or more essential organs cease to function.
The immune system would not mount it's normal response to a virus. That means infected people who have an immune tolerance response wouldn't show symptoms of sickness. They wouldn't be sniffling, coughing, headachey, feverish, etc. They would appear well. Until they developed symptoms of organ failure. And died.
No future super strain is needed. Current strains of COVID currently circulating would be deadly for someone with an IgG4 dominated immune tolerance response. If there were 3 billion people that already had immune tolerance responses to COVID, they would already be dying rapidly and in very large numbers. That isn't happening right now, therefore high IgG4 levels cannot already be the case in a large fraction of the population, much less in 3 billion people.
If it is the plan of the depopulation cabal to use IgG4 immune tolerance to do the killing, then they have no need to release a new strain. Existing strains would do the job. If widespread actual immune tolerance to COVID were to develop, which it hasn't and we don't know if it will, all the cabal would have to do is wait for people die from the currently circulating COVID strains.
Thanks for your input and contribution. We'll circle back round to this soon. Within months this scenario will have played out if there's any real and significantly widespread new strain infections.
If only there were more citizen funding of specific research projects covering various aspects of testing e.g. immunological, genetic sequencing etc.
The fecklessness of the human race is its guaranteed ruination at the hands of motivated minority who simply acts and keeps iterating their actions.
For all the "awake" with their collective will, skills and resources, they can barely string together a project amongst themselves and even then, only piecemeal, small scale, often born out of pure self-interest and as a result of personal trauma.
You may be interested in the work of Geert Vanden Bossche. He's predicted the evolution of the virus into a highly virulent variant which will be a serious danger to the highly vaccinated. I find his hypothesis plausible.
Dr Rennebohm's 1 hr video summarizing Geert's book:
https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/dr-rennebohm-summarises-geerts-book
a video discussion between Geert, Dr. Rennebohm, and Dr. McMillan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKDhjASd7ZE
more recent than Geert's book and contains useful tidbits
Geert's 10 part video series (parts are a couple minutes each), link to part 1:
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/how-mrna-vaccines-and-vaccine-breakthrough
towards the end of the series is Geert making specific predictions and recommendations based on details of vaccination and infection history.
This specific combination of videos, viewed in the order listed, is a good orientation and brings you up to date on Geert's latest thoughts.
I've paid scant attention to GVB for no particular reason and that's not because I've discounted him. I'll revisit. I was aware of his opposition to mass vaccination in a pandemic, immune escape etc.
Thanks for the comprehensive links.
The evolution of new variants is ongoing. Some variants are likely to be more dangerous. The appearance of a new strain that is widespread and dangerous is not confirmation of the coke-head's scenario. The unique identifying feature of the coke-head's scenario is the media psyop, one clearly aimed to implicate governments and turn the people against their leaders.
But if that's the primary/a high order aim/feature of Coke-Head's Theorem, what does that bring that isn't already there from the current state of affairs? The entire mechanics of the virus and gene therapy scenario is now largely binary - natural virus of threat needed rapid approach that could've been risky for some to get back to normal vs. genetic engineering driving harmful outcomes for spectrum of possible profit and control motives. It's pretty much a simple dichotomy where you don't get people subscribing from the latter to the former i.e. it's a one way street. Those who red pill literally can't ever blue pill.
Adding in "and another thing, they did something/added another easter egg that's even worse" doesn't exacerbate the pre-existing dichotomy.
There are already many easter eggs built in, in plain sight.
Moderna's does is 3x Pfizer's. No explanation of why it was 100ug is given, even on a self-contained reactogenicity basis by Moderna. Pfizer acknowledged they got a read on 10ug then set at 30ug but did not explain why. The question is not "why is M's X and P's is Y?" because the answer is always "we didn't have anything to do with the other, so ask them about theirs", as Gerrard Rennick (dumbly) discovered several times when he kept asking this stupid question to which he already knew the answer. He should have just asked, "why did you set your dose at Xug?" and then, with both companies' answer in hand, others could cross compare and evaluate.
That easter egg is as valuable and technical as "what else is in this shit?", "where does this shit go?", "how long does this shit last?" etc. Each of these questions are also easter eggs and, as they are being answered, anyone coming into contact with the answers is forced to scrape a bit more red pill into their mouths.
In this way, I'm not sure I view either EoH hypothesis as completely artificial psyops, although I fully recognise the high price and risk that comes with publicly looking at and trying to evaluate them, given their source and nature.
Trouble is, the first EoHH can now be said to be partially proven in terms of stealth payload and cancer links, while the germ cell, specific gene interaction and RT mechanism are yet to be analysed and proven. But pending human genetic sequencing may actually shed light on these areas. Stay tuned on this. Buckhaults PhD has said he is going to look, and McKernan is also on the case. Something else of import may also finally be analysed that could be another big piece of the puzzle.
For the record my reason for not getting juiced was that my aunt died about 6 hours of getting her second dose of Moderna. The punchline being she was told at her previous medical a couple months prior by her physician that she had and I quote ‘a five star heart’. She was cremated by the authorities despite my uncle’s protests for an autopsy... nothing to see here...
I am deeply sorry to hear this. My sincere condolences. No one should be subjected to such treatment and no one should have to learn a lesson/form a decision based on such a trauma. You are describing literal crimes.
Forgive me for saying, but have you:
1. filed your own YC and VAERS reports?
2. discussed filing criminal complaints against the medic re the advice, the injury and informed consent issues, and the state's action to deny autopsy and cremate?
3. filed a request for a VDPS payment due to her passing as a result of gene therapy injury?
It unfortunately happened in the States. I’m outside that jurisdiction. I don’t think my uncle had the heart to pursue it...
Coke-Head's Theorem brings nothing useful to the decision making process. If I believe him, then I am demoralized because I am then a sitting duck regardless of whether I got the vax or not.
From that perspective, Coke-Head's Theorem IS the psyop. The only actionable remedy for his scenario is if you are un-vaxxed and can take up permanent residence at an off-grid bug-out shelter. The vast majority of people either don't have a bug-out shelter or could not contrive one on such short notice. That leaves most people helpless, and demoralized, waiting for the end. So, no benefit and significant cost to believing him.
If I dis-believe him, there is no penalty. If I am one of the few who has a bug-out shelter, then I am going to be on alert anyway and I don't need his story to tell me it's time to go. If I don't have a bug-out shelter, then I cant take action anyway. Same reasoning for preppers who plan to shelter-in-place.
Because his story isn't plausible to start with, and because it's demoralizing, my guess is that the story originates from the cabal and it's purpose is to make people believe that "resistance is futile" and "stop fighting us, you'll never win anyway". All the more reason to dis-believe such stories. They aren't helpful. The more people believe such stories the more people will cease resisting and the more advantage shifts to the cabal.
Point taken.
What about the notion that fatalism or nihilism can be harnessed and fashioned into war of a sort?
I played with both your and this point in this story:
Basliners - How the war was won
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/baseliners
An interesting story. I do think that when the damage done is realized and if there is no hopeful cure available, the ill will contemplate how to punish the perps. Terminally ill people don't have much to lose. It's entirely possible there could be a creative retaliation such as the one you described. I wonder if perhaps the cabal was counting on the ill dying quickly, before retaliation could be wrought.