I would like to see another nation bring this before the ICC. No western nation will have the guts from what I see. Africa, India, you know, the rising BRICS nations. It would go further in exposing them and the UN for the global West puppet they are.
A doable blueprint for salvation from the ever expanding medical fraud field if business! I applaud you sir and hope more like minded individuals will see the benefits you've described. Thank you.
Comprehensive, striving for objectivity, post, thank you! Wow, how did Healy miss my boat? Thank you for bringing him onboard! Adding him to Szasz, and the rest of the responsible defenders of freedom. This "Scientific Fraud" issue is crucial to understand in order to delegitimate the politicization of "The Science" and take the power away from those who would assume it.
The big picture to me seems to suggest that SO many branches of "science" and its derivative technology were twisted, suppressed or subverted quite a while ago.
Often the origins of this lie in the late stage of the classic industrial age or so called capitalism, or into the early stage of the seriously destructive "philosophy" branches of post industrialism and so on.
That is also the decades where propaganda and mass media really got established, which essentially was when technology combined with instrumental psychology made it possible for a few to somehow sway, manipulate and even commandeer the masses.
Its ages ago that I read (at least some of) Untergang des Abendlandes, but I do remember that even back then in the early nineties it felt eerily strange that a text like that could be even more descriptive of the present than for when it was written.
My personal take on all of that is that I blame the mechanistic/materialistic "thinking" which took hold for real around then, and then eventually led to the complete lunacy of 2020 and onwards.
I have been waiting for decades for the phase we are seeing now, where people all over the place do NOT shut up, hide or mince their words on this any longer! Especially here on Substack totalitarian materialism is as dead as it is as an idea in the first place!
Are you calling for volunteers for something? If so, I wonder what I can do to help? I am 72 and a retired technical writer who is living so far below the poverty line that I cannot give money. But I still have a functional brain.
About 1 year ago I was hospitalized with what was called covid, and when I left hospital had a range of diseases that I did not have before I entered. The major one is supposed diabetes, in fact, every aspect of metabolic syndrome. I was simply not prepared to go on a whole suite of dangerous lifetime drugs for different aspects of metabolic syndrome when they are clearly all part of the same disease, so I started researching alternatives.
That was the first time in my life I had read peer reviewed medical papers and I was horrified. My technical writer's brain could not help but pick up the design and logical shortfalls in the papers I was reading, even when I wanted them to be right. The design of the experiments was often futile, in that they could prove nothing, and the conclusions drawn from them often bore no relationship to the apparent data given. Even I, with no medical knowledge, and no way of understanding the experimental details, could tell that these papers were not "fit for purpose". But they are peer reviewed and published.
So I have personally experienced the inadequacy of the peer review system. But the problem goes further than that. Doctors won't read peer reviewed papers! When I do find a well conducted piece of research, I try to get my current doctor (I have gone through three in a year) to read that paper. I am asking the doctors to keep me safe while I experiment with natural alternatives to toxic drugs. There are many natural foods or extracts that can be used to replace medications for all aspects of metabolic syndrome, coumarin from various plants to replace warfarin, berberine from various plants to replace metformin etc. These are all demonstrated effective in peer reviewed published medical papers (albeit knowing their limitations). But, despite this research, most doctors do not even seem to know the research exists, let alone be willing to read it.
It is not just the medical publication infrastructure that has been captured. It is also the training of doctors that has been captured by the drug companies. In their training, they are only educated on drugs. Anything that does not require drugs, for example vagus nerve damage and rehabilitation, or anything where "natural" products are proven to be as effective as drugs, is not part of medical training.
I have also been reading papers on the dangers of EMFs. There are hundreds of these papers, and the possible dangers are well demonstrated and documented, but the topic is still taboo to mainstream medicine and its practitioners. I have not even tried to raise it my doctors - it's hard enough to try to get them to research berberine.
But it gets even worse. The medical industry delivery is no longer designed for the treatment of individuals by their personal doctor. Living in rural Australia, I only have access to massive clinics staffed by recently graduated interns who stay for 6 months then move on. They are not locals, they have no intention of becoming locals, and they have no interest in building an understanding of their clients. They order tests based on gender and age, they interpret those tests, and they offer drugs, where they can, based on the results of those tests. That's it. The individual does not exist. One size fits all. They do not order rare or expensive tests, they do not investigate syndromes, and they do not register feedback if their drugs are harming their customer. In my experience they do not even read the test results thoroughly and I now insist on getting copies of everything and studying them myself. I will then ask the doctor to interpret particular results out of the normal range, and have found they simply do not know what those numbers mean.
In other words, modern "family" medicine, as I am experiencing it, is not "fit for purpose".
So yes, we need to reform the peer review process, and behind that, even the way experiments are designed. But even with the best published research in the world, how are we going to get the doctors to read the kind of papers that can be accessed via Greenmedinfo (a front end that enables sorting of Pubmed articles by natural products).
Then how do we get them to care?
The whole lot has to go and be replaced with something that IS fit for purpose.
There is nothing I can personally do to initiate change, based on my own health, stamina and lack of medical training. But in the meantime, if there is anything that my nitpicking brain can offer to your endeavours, please feel free to contact me. Anything from administration to analysis to writing. I'll happily "assist".
No more trusting any of this. They can make all the changes in the world and that won't matter to me. Once a fraudster, always a fraudster. There is no going back.
I would like to see another nation bring this before the ICC. No western nation will have the guts from what I see. Africa, India, you know, the rising BRICS nations. It would go further in exposing them and the UN for the global West puppet they are.
Great article. Thank-you.
As a layperson I’m in for crowd sourcing blockchain
A doable blueprint for salvation from the ever expanding medical fraud field if business! I applaud you sir and hope more like minded individuals will see the benefits you've described. Thank you.
Comprehensive, striving for objectivity, post, thank you! Wow, how did Healy miss my boat? Thank you for bringing him onboard! Adding him to Szasz, and the rest of the responsible defenders of freedom. This "Scientific Fraud" issue is crucial to understand in order to delegitimate the politicization of "The Science" and take the power away from those who would assume it.
Stay free then safe.
The big picture to me seems to suggest that SO many branches of "science" and its derivative technology were twisted, suppressed or subverted quite a while ago.
Often the origins of this lie in the late stage of the classic industrial age or so called capitalism, or into the early stage of the seriously destructive "philosophy" branches of post industrialism and so on.
That is also the decades where propaganda and mass media really got established, which essentially was when technology combined with instrumental psychology made it possible for a few to somehow sway, manipulate and even commandeer the masses.
Its ages ago that I read (at least some of) Untergang des Abendlandes, but I do remember that even back then in the early nineties it felt eerily strange that a text like that could be even more descriptive of the present than for when it was written.
My personal take on all of that is that I blame the mechanistic/materialistic "thinking" which took hold for real around then, and then eventually led to the complete lunacy of 2020 and onwards.
I have been waiting for decades for the phase we are seeing now, where people all over the place do NOT shut up, hide or mince their words on this any longer! Especially here on Substack totalitarian materialism is as dead as it is as an idea in the first place!
Are you calling for volunteers for something? If so, I wonder what I can do to help? I am 72 and a retired technical writer who is living so far below the poverty line that I cannot give money. But I still have a functional brain.
About 1 year ago I was hospitalized with what was called covid, and when I left hospital had a range of diseases that I did not have before I entered. The major one is supposed diabetes, in fact, every aspect of metabolic syndrome. I was simply not prepared to go on a whole suite of dangerous lifetime drugs for different aspects of metabolic syndrome when they are clearly all part of the same disease, so I started researching alternatives.
That was the first time in my life I had read peer reviewed medical papers and I was horrified. My technical writer's brain could not help but pick up the design and logical shortfalls in the papers I was reading, even when I wanted them to be right. The design of the experiments was often futile, in that they could prove nothing, and the conclusions drawn from them often bore no relationship to the apparent data given. Even I, with no medical knowledge, and no way of understanding the experimental details, could tell that these papers were not "fit for purpose". But they are peer reviewed and published.
So I have personally experienced the inadequacy of the peer review system. But the problem goes further than that. Doctors won't read peer reviewed papers! When I do find a well conducted piece of research, I try to get my current doctor (I have gone through three in a year) to read that paper. I am asking the doctors to keep me safe while I experiment with natural alternatives to toxic drugs. There are many natural foods or extracts that can be used to replace medications for all aspects of metabolic syndrome, coumarin from various plants to replace warfarin, berberine from various plants to replace metformin etc. These are all demonstrated effective in peer reviewed published medical papers (albeit knowing their limitations). But, despite this research, most doctors do not even seem to know the research exists, let alone be willing to read it.
It is not just the medical publication infrastructure that has been captured. It is also the training of doctors that has been captured by the drug companies. In their training, they are only educated on drugs. Anything that does not require drugs, for example vagus nerve damage and rehabilitation, or anything where "natural" products are proven to be as effective as drugs, is not part of medical training.
I have also been reading papers on the dangers of EMFs. There are hundreds of these papers, and the possible dangers are well demonstrated and documented, but the topic is still taboo to mainstream medicine and its practitioners. I have not even tried to raise it my doctors - it's hard enough to try to get them to research berberine.
But it gets even worse. The medical industry delivery is no longer designed for the treatment of individuals by their personal doctor. Living in rural Australia, I only have access to massive clinics staffed by recently graduated interns who stay for 6 months then move on. They are not locals, they have no intention of becoming locals, and they have no interest in building an understanding of their clients. They order tests based on gender and age, they interpret those tests, and they offer drugs, where they can, based on the results of those tests. That's it. The individual does not exist. One size fits all. They do not order rare or expensive tests, they do not investigate syndromes, and they do not register feedback if their drugs are harming their customer. In my experience they do not even read the test results thoroughly and I now insist on getting copies of everything and studying them myself. I will then ask the doctor to interpret particular results out of the normal range, and have found they simply do not know what those numbers mean.
In other words, modern "family" medicine, as I am experiencing it, is not "fit for purpose".
So yes, we need to reform the peer review process, and behind that, even the way experiments are designed. But even with the best published research in the world, how are we going to get the doctors to read the kind of papers that can be accessed via Greenmedinfo (a front end that enables sorting of Pubmed articles by natural products).
Then how do we get them to care?
The whole lot has to go and be replaced with something that IS fit for purpose.
There is nothing I can personally do to initiate change, based on my own health, stamina and lack of medical training. But in the meantime, if there is anything that my nitpicking brain can offer to your endeavours, please feel free to contact me. Anything from administration to analysis to writing. I'll happily "assist".
No more trusting any of this. They can make all the changes in the world and that won't matter to me. Once a fraudster, always a fraudster. There is no going back.