3 Comments
User's avatar
LM's avatar

GREAT ARTICLE!

Expand full comment
rg's avatar

I have always thought that Sweden's COVID exceptionalism was an op. It was a net benefit to the perpetrators to have an example showing that they didn't have the whole developed western world locked up. By contrast, a sub-Saharan African government, or that of Haiti, wouldn't serve that purpose for some reason, so the cabal just went in and murdered those leaders.

I was not scouring the media methodically, but the first mention I saw of a government official or the like saying that vaccine passports would be a good idea came out of Sweden.

I though of Sweden when, later on, New Zealand did something slightly different from some other country about COVID or the gene therapy shots, and Jacinda Ardern said "It's an example of governments making different choices." Protesting too much, as they say.

Expand full comment
Ignasz Semmelweisz's avatar

Hard to know. You have to take a global view and look at all the nations who did little or nothing re Covid. Africa being the obvious continent that renders Sweden globally irrelevant. You could use US states in the same way.

But you have to accept that all the COVID case and death data, globally, is false. And once you go down that road, literally all bets are off. All you are left with is All Cause Mortality and deviations from the 5YMA, which seems to suggest a correlation between dosing and increasing death, which now exceeds COVID first wave in a lot of places.

On that basis, the fact that there are no official studies into this issue on a national or international basis in English-speaking nations as a matter of national priority tells me what I need to know.

Then just add in the absolutely pathetic media treatment of the post COVID and gene therapy world and you don't really need data any more to know what's going on. The only question is the degree to which it was all forward planned or bunglingly coincidental. The effect is and will be the same: nose-diving health, shorter lifespans, increasing deaths, lowering fertility and deformed and/or sickly kids who might also be infertile.

Genetic sequencing information should start becoming available within 6 months and after that, people's behaviour is going to move into irrationality, so the science and results are likely to be forcibly suppressed using the methods of censorship and lawfare we're watching be established and exercised.

Expand full comment