Covid: The Unifying Theory of Everything (part four)

How have layers of the G3P acted throughout Covid?

Republished due to an earlier error

What is Covid for?

If Covid is manmade and deliberately released, that release had a purpose.

If it was accidentally released and triggered a pandemic (infection spread over a large area irrespective of severity of illness or deaths), there was an entire primary ecosystem set up and waiting to use it and profit from it.

Are these two scenarios different? If they are, how different are they and do these differences matter?

Let’s consider the common, undeniable facts based on two sets of sources:

• planning and policy documents published by all the main players;

• public statements made by all the main players at every level of the G3P.

Just on the pharma medical aspects of Covid alone, I think this it is fair to say that BMGF/CEPI/GAVI and big pharma structures going right into government and the patent system shows that the entire genetic engineering medical system (GEMS) had been deliberately set up over decades, involving every player you’ve seen on TV, which draws in pretty much every supranational body and national institution in every developed country.

Let’s quickly look at the G3P structure and tick off who has had a hand in the Covid trajectory.

Policy Makers

BIS and Central Banks: All co-ordinated around printing and spending public money throughout Covid on all the measures that have been proven to have zero efficacy (NPIs, SIPOs, gene therapies). That money is owed by you and I and has gone straight into private hands involved in providing anything towards Covid policy implementation. In short, all top level banks have robbed citizens for the enrichment of the elite. Again. This is the standard model of the developed world. It has only increased in speed and size in Covid because this is the the milking of the existing system before we are ported over to a new one which locks in their gains and makes them inaccessible and unrecoverable to the public.

WEF/CFR/CoR/CH/Rockefellers: the WEF is the public policy frontman now, that looks like it is the entity driving the Great Reset. There’s no way that it is the only agent. If people abandoned and rejected the WEF, there are other mechanisms of power that would take the lead. Note, The Trilateral Commission is a Rockefeller organisation and no one talks about it, yet it is a club of corporate and power entities just like the WEF. All of these organisations are involved in everything in the world from War to Food and they determine policy in all areas through overt and covert means.

Policy Distributors

Have any major entities in this layer opposed or defied global Covid policy? Here’s how I roughly logically order this layer:

• Philanthropaths, some global corporations and NGOs have publicly dictated Covid policy. Deep state actors that don’t appear on the G3P diagram e.g. CIA are involved in this as well (see: RFK’s claims that CIA runs all the pandemic exercises). There was an initial window when Governments were actually saying things that, in hindsight, made sense (masks useless, low IFR, most people will be fine) and ring true now. There was also a clear point, around late April 2020, when everyone switched into a lockstep global policy that tied in with Bill Gates telling the world the way it was going to be. After that point, WEF etc went full tilt publicly rolling out The Great Reset and all its constituent parts.

• The WHO initially legitimised the Chinese approach to Covid in order to push that approach globally, downwards into governments for enforcement. The WHO is essentially captured and aligned to the Philanthropaths and is their agent.

• The UN is another reinforcer and legitimiser. Just look at this page and note the phraseology and the embedded slogans.

• The IMF & World Bank are, according to John Perkins and others, US controlled entities that financially capture nations and make them subservient to the US. Take a loan from either one and you will be contractually bound to so degrees of the US’ bidding. I see these entities as the sticky grease between the many little cogs in the machine.

• I see the IPCC as something much bigger than Covid. It could be argued that Covid serves many purposes including powerfully conditioning people into behaviours and mentalities that make them finally capitulate to enforced changes in line with climate change narrative. Very simply, one could say, “We all nearly died from deadly Covid, but because we all pulled together, did the right things and took the medicine, we pulled through and saved ourselves. This shows that we are capable of doing the same when it comes to climate change. Now, everyone follow this policy.” This is basically what’s happening. Also, climate change narrative is used to reinforce Covid policy (lockdowns are now a tool for combating climate change) and obfuscate the shortcomings in Covid (heart attacks due to climate change).

• Many global corporations have been the outsourcers of policy implementation. It is corporations who have enforced conformance on their employees in every aspect of policy and they have all parroted policy slogans, including vaccination. If you think about this, it is totally insane. No corporation has the right, skill or ability to tell employees what to do medically, yet they have. Global corporations have received bail out money by the state, so the public have again been robbed by collusion between the state and corporations via an increasing public balance sheet, rising taxes and reducing services in both public and private sectors. Inflation and shrinkflation involves both public and private entities and most harshly affects citizens.

Policy Enforcers

There are almost no dissenters in this layer. Look at what the diagram lists. All those entities have gone along with the policies that have come from further up the G3P. This tells you that nations are largely not sovereign and that the citizens in them don’t control anything. All the key institutions must be captured if they move in lockstep. Which nations have defied global Covid policy? Sweden was not a full dissenter, only partial. Any nation that has conformed to vaccination policy is not a dissenter. That means that all the lauded US states like Florida aren’t dissenters either.

A true dissenter would have critically analysed the true scale and irreversible possible ramifications of the vaccines and taken one, two or three months to analyse before backing the gene therapies, but no one did. If there were citizen groups out there who worked out the gene therapy risks and unknowns, then it was not beyond any state level player to do the same.

Despite opposing all the NPIs, Ron DeSantis still failed when it came to analysing the gene therapies. If he himself was dosed, he fell for the narrative.

Something to remember: this layer encapsulates the entire legal system of any given nation.

Policy Propagandists

All have done what we know them to have done, and continue to do. The BBC’s latest attempt at moronic propaganda stands a chance of blowing up as the misrepresented participants spill the beans to GB News on what actually went on and how bent the BBC is. The trouble facing presenter Hannah Fry being a mathematician and then riding on those laurels is that maths is fairly absolute at its more obvious levels. Claiming that 8% of the UK population is unvaccinated isn’t a mathematical mistake, it’s a flat out lie. Even the HSA figures indicate it’s 30%+. The programme took six days to shoot and was edited down to 63 minutes.

BBC: “Around four million adults remain unvaccinated.”

This table suggests that there are at least 19m people unvaccinated.

Let’s ask a simple and brutal question. Literally how thick do you have to be to believe out of hand the BBC’s claim of “4 million”? If you can stand it, look at the reinforcement of the BBC’s propaganda by The Guardian, another state vassal. Why doesn’t The Guardian check the “4 million” number?

There’s one very, very simple question that falls out of the BBC’s own false number, which seems to have sailed past The BBC and The Guardian.

If only 4 million UK citizens remain unvaccinated, that’s about 6% of the population. Therefore, we are already above the required herd immunity threshold, so why does such a small proportion of the population matter in the vaccination paradigm?

I would suggest there are at least two primary techniques in play here:

1. Control and containment of those who have been dosed in the face of increasing levels of evidence that there was no need and there’s no real efficacy, in fact there’s the opposite i.e. reassure the dosed that they did the right thing because they are in the “94%”.

2. Another attempt to convince the undosed that they are more minority than they really are and therefore psychologically bully the weakest of them into getting dosed in the upcoming winter drive.

I’m fairly certain that if people haven’t been dosed by now, they literally never will unless they were facing overt force like in Canada, Australia and the US. Also, I think that this 30% proportion is a basic metric that tells us:

• the limits of reach of Policy Propagandists;

• the reach of the alt media in all its forms;

• the proportion of the population who are either sufficiently independent critical thinkers or sufficiently sceptical, doubtful, fearful or untrusting of the system and the messages it delivers.

The BBC is literally trying to psychologically weaken this section of society by inflating the relative size of the dosed club and peddling messages about why the undosed club is wrong, stupid, or can’t or shouldn’t hold out.

Think about when these techniques have been used in the past:

• I recall hearing that a basic trick the Nazi party employed when recruiting was to start its membership numbers at, say, 10,001.

• In war, leaflet drops tell enemies that they can’t win and to surrender to the superior force.

Propagandistic intimidation in every form has been used in Covid and literally every message has been proven to be false from inception or proven wrong with evidence.

Just check the BMGF awarded grants page to see how much it paid for BBC, Guardian, Telegraph etc. They are remarkably cheap.

The Public

The public has largely done what it was told to do.

Those who didn’t were unable to communicate, grow and meaningfully resist in the key early phases of the pandemic because the rest of the G3P had, over decades utterly disarmed them.

What situation in society since World War 2 ever really required mass counter-narrative awareness and resistance in the Western world?

Absolutely none. No war was global, no financial crash had global effects that were as damaging at so much of the individual level in such visible and meaningful ways. All these events up to Covid were distant, abstract or compartmentalised enough to mean that most people did not care enough to question, know and act from the grassroots level.

Now, when the public needs to protect its interests and rights it reaches for the structures and organisation that government, law and the social contract are supposed to provide, only to find that they no longer exist in the form that the public thought they did, and the public hasn’t got any workable alternatives built as backups.

This means that if the public was behind the curve before Covid, it’s getting further behind every day since.