Good work! As an economist and non-biologist, I trust people like Spartacus, Sasha Latypova, and Kevin McKernan to out the conspiracy elements of the virus and the vaccines, which appear pretty obvious. Spartacus has another post referenced in the below about how unlikely all the alleged "coincidences" were. I intuited the hypothesis in March 2020, having taken the red pill in September 2001. The only basis for hope is supernatural, IMO. Dr. Zelenko felt the same way. cheers
It's striking how many doses of COVID "vaccines" are said to have been administered worldwide, around 13 billion. I'm not sure where the estimates are for how many people have had none, but I might guess between a quarter and half. I think the official estimates of the percentage "vaccinated" are intentionally too high.
In any event, 13 billion doses is huge. I wonder whether the size and speed of the campaign, and the contents of the injected products, were designed as a kind of optimum between (1) the fear that they might end up with only one good chance to accomplish some of the main goals, and (2) the effort to normalize and entrench the mRNA platform, to be used against other pathogens and for other purposes. The first of these possibilities could be described punningly as "One Shot", as Robert DeNiro says in the Deer Hunter.
Overstating dosed numbers was a deliberate manipulation technique employed as a psychological manipulation tool. A pilot's union and a British airline both separately and deliberately stated that dosed numbers of pilots were around 80%+ but there was literally no reason to state this assertion/extrapolation, and very shaky data grounds to base it on, plus they withheld any methodology by which they came to the asserted figure. Why do it? Partly to psychologically marginalise those who hadn't had it and make them feel outsiders/minorities/wrong-uns etc. Those hold outs, it turned out, were fully vindicated across a number of reasons, all of them fundamentally underpinned by the basic understanding of their job and legal responsibilities. All of this was grossly ignored by the union and every British (and practically all global) airlines. There was no basis for any of the stances they took, legally, logically, evidentially. Yet they wilfully said things they didn't have the right or basis to say, and they tried to influence behaviour to get dosed. Why? There are several reasons at least and most of them are at almost infantile levels of thinking and analysis, some of them involving outright cowardice and utterly misplaced priorities and beliefs in cause and effect. Being in any wash-up/review of decisions made by individuals, teams, managers and the industry now would be like watching a clown show made up of children and apes sliding around in foaming custard.
The size and speed of the campaign incorporates on two fundamental things:
1. Disaster Capitalism approach;
2. The effect fear has on opening the compliance pathway, which is fundamental to Disaster Capitalism.
These two things are independent of any other nefarious plans. Just on the surface, once you believe (or have constructed) a plan to implement a global solution that you know will make you rich with almost no real downside (due immunities) you are into Disaster Capitalism mode, even if you don't consciously realise it. Why? Because you're trading off fear and providing only one option, knowing that it will be taken because of multiple fears in play that you have both created with prior actions/comms/decisions/analysis (or lack of) and allow to persist.
True leadership would have been to do as some in Africa did, which was to sit still, do little to nothing, analyse those who bayed and screamed and stoked the fear problem then offered up immediately the fear-fixing "solutions". As we know, a few who lead like this died quickly for it and were replaced with compliant puppets. And still, Africa is one of if not THE largest control groups because the corrupt implementation was so faulty it could not self sustain to penetrate deep into Africa, even though our toxic waste products have been dumped on that poor continent.
We've said on here and in other fora that this is not done and never will be. The truest mistake of any of the hoi polloi is to believe that it will end, be fixed, stop, be rolled back etc. It simply will not be. Why? Because those vested in the agenda are on the curve and constantly adapting their implementations on an iterative basis. The citizens are nowhere near.
Proof? They cannot demonstrate collective focus and key, collective actions on fundamental challenges at the legal and legislative coalface. Even if you think 35% are awake, 35% are not and never will act. Most will choose to do nothing. A lot are actually too feckless or inept when it comes to acting, although they can be directed to support if they can identify a trusted leadership team. Huge amounts of people only deal with surface narrative and will not look at any detail.
You can be anti-Covid, pro-Ukraine war, pro-climate change, pro-censorship, pro-hang Lucy letby and hang Julian Assange. Yet all of things follow the same MO and pattern, for the same basic ends and crumble as soon as you apply the same thought process and investigation just below the surface in a couple of hours per topic.
That's the trouble with people.
Go on Twitter and look at paedo hunter Stinson Hunter's reactions/assessment to Lucy Letby. It's unbelievable. I've just pointed him at a load of other things he needed to look at and he literally flamed me with a litany of insults.
Here is my take on hope:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-not-fall-for-false-hope
And here is about all past, present, and future hypotheses:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-right-and-who-is-wrong
Hi Ray,
Good work. I agree with your sentiments and observations.
You may find this triptych of fiction chimes with you:
https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/baseliners
Thank you kindly. You are publishing well-researched articles in an extremely professional manner!
My stuff is light journalism compared to yours. :)
You lost me at "gonads are male". The female gonads are ovaries. Look it up.
Thanks.
The section has been corrected and updated.
Good work! As an economist and non-biologist, I trust people like Spartacus, Sasha Latypova, and Kevin McKernan to out the conspiracy elements of the virus and the vaccines, which appear pretty obvious. Spartacus has another post referenced in the below about how unlikely all the alleged "coincidences" were. I intuited the hypothesis in March 2020, having taken the red pill in September 2001. The only basis for hope is supernatural, IMO. Dr. Zelenko felt the same way. cheers
https://elliottmiddleton.substack.com/p/the-theory-of-mind-and-the-current
It's striking how many doses of COVID "vaccines" are said to have been administered worldwide, around 13 billion. I'm not sure where the estimates are for how many people have had none, but I might guess between a quarter and half. I think the official estimates of the percentage "vaccinated" are intentionally too high.
In any event, 13 billion doses is huge. I wonder whether the size and speed of the campaign, and the contents of the injected products, were designed as a kind of optimum between (1) the fear that they might end up with only one good chance to accomplish some of the main goals, and (2) the effort to normalize and entrench the mRNA platform, to be used against other pathogens and for other purposes. The first of these possibilities could be described punningly as "One Shot", as Robert DeNiro says in the Deer Hunter.
Overstating dosed numbers was a deliberate manipulation technique employed as a psychological manipulation tool. A pilot's union and a British airline both separately and deliberately stated that dosed numbers of pilots were around 80%+ but there was literally no reason to state this assertion/extrapolation, and very shaky data grounds to base it on, plus they withheld any methodology by which they came to the asserted figure. Why do it? Partly to psychologically marginalise those who hadn't had it and make them feel outsiders/minorities/wrong-uns etc. Those hold outs, it turned out, were fully vindicated across a number of reasons, all of them fundamentally underpinned by the basic understanding of their job and legal responsibilities. All of this was grossly ignored by the union and every British (and practically all global) airlines. There was no basis for any of the stances they took, legally, logically, evidentially. Yet they wilfully said things they didn't have the right or basis to say, and they tried to influence behaviour to get dosed. Why? There are several reasons at least and most of them are at almost infantile levels of thinking and analysis, some of them involving outright cowardice and utterly misplaced priorities and beliefs in cause and effect. Being in any wash-up/review of decisions made by individuals, teams, managers and the industry now would be like watching a clown show made up of children and apes sliding around in foaming custard.
The size and speed of the campaign incorporates on two fundamental things:
1. Disaster Capitalism approach;
2. The effect fear has on opening the compliance pathway, which is fundamental to Disaster Capitalism.
These two things are independent of any other nefarious plans. Just on the surface, once you believe (or have constructed) a plan to implement a global solution that you know will make you rich with almost no real downside (due immunities) you are into Disaster Capitalism mode, even if you don't consciously realise it. Why? Because you're trading off fear and providing only one option, knowing that it will be taken because of multiple fears in play that you have both created with prior actions/comms/decisions/analysis (or lack of) and allow to persist.
True leadership would have been to do as some in Africa did, which was to sit still, do little to nothing, analyse those who bayed and screamed and stoked the fear problem then offered up immediately the fear-fixing "solutions". As we know, a few who lead like this died quickly for it and were replaced with compliant puppets. And still, Africa is one of if not THE largest control groups because the corrupt implementation was so faulty it could not self sustain to penetrate deep into Africa, even though our toxic waste products have been dumped on that poor continent.
We've said on here and in other fora that this is not done and never will be. The truest mistake of any of the hoi polloi is to believe that it will end, be fixed, stop, be rolled back etc. It simply will not be. Why? Because those vested in the agenda are on the curve and constantly adapting their implementations on an iterative basis. The citizens are nowhere near.
Proof? They cannot demonstrate collective focus and key, collective actions on fundamental challenges at the legal and legislative coalface. Even if you think 35% are awake, 35% are not and never will act. Most will choose to do nothing. A lot are actually too feckless or inept when it comes to acting, although they can be directed to support if they can identify a trusted leadership team. Huge amounts of people only deal with surface narrative and will not look at any detail.
You can be anti-Covid, pro-Ukraine war, pro-climate change, pro-censorship, pro-hang Lucy letby and hang Julian Assange. Yet all of things follow the same MO and pattern, for the same basic ends and crumble as soon as you apply the same thought process and investigation just below the surface in a couple of hours per topic.
That's the trouble with people.
Go on Twitter and look at paedo hunter Stinson Hunter's reactions/assessment to Lucy Letby. It's unbelievable. I've just pointed him at a load of other things he needed to look at and he literally flamed me with a litany of insults.
Look at these two threads:
https://twitter.com/StinsonHunter/status/1693312289003184344
https://twitter.com/StinsonHunter/status/1693330669710057579
Getting people to conclude something is as easy as shifting a gear, provided you pressed the clutch first.
Telling people "everyone else has taken it, so shouldn't/why haven't you?" is pressing the clutch. Guess what most of them do next?