1. Please provide links to the specific suits filed by Trump that you are stating definitively exist, without which your claim is an evidence-free assertion. Obviously, if your claims are true then public court records will exist and it will be a trivial matter to show those. If you do not have them, what is the source underlying your claims, please?
2. You're claiming that Trump has used actual litigation to suppress media, which can be assumed to mean any form of it including the most powerful. Thus, you are claiming the efficacy of that legal action and strategy. Yet, you are also encouraging literally anyone--individuals with no resources--to spread material (if they possess it) or claims/statements (with or without evidence) that either prove or allege crimes of Trump. These actions you encourage are the same ones that you say resulted in litigation that was successful against resourced corporations. You are literally encouraging people to render themselves liable for various forms of litigation you claim is successful including defamation lawsuits, from Trump. This encouragement contradicts your opening claim about Trump's litigation and/or seems to constitute woefully poor advice to citizens if your initial claim is true.
3. No evidence of crimes relating to Jeffrey Epstein is required in order to impeach Trump. If you only care about his impeachment in order to remove him from office and possibly jail him under US Federal and state laws, multiple grounds for that already exist just since he took office in January 2025. These grounds have nothing to do with any prior impeachment effort, Epstein or his first term. Would you be happy to pursue his impeachment on these grounds, not the unproven and inaccessible Epstein-related claims?
1. Please provide links to the specific suits filed by Trump that you are stating definitively exist, without which your claim is an evidence-free assertion. Obviously, if your claims are true then public court records will exist and it will be a trivial matter to show those. If you do not have them, what is the source underlying your claims, please?
2. You're claiming that Trump has used actual litigation to suppress media, which can be assumed to mean any form of it including the most powerful. Thus, you are claiming the efficacy of that legal action and strategy. Yet, you are also encouraging literally anyone--individuals with no resources--to spread material (if they possess it) or claims/statements (with or without evidence) that either prove or allege crimes of Trump. These actions you encourage are the same ones that you say resulted in litigation that was successful against resourced corporations. You are literally encouraging people to render themselves liable for various forms of litigation you claim is successful including defamation lawsuits, from Trump. This encouragement contradicts your opening claim about Trump's litigation and/or seems to constitute woefully poor advice to citizens if your initial claim is true.
3. No evidence of crimes relating to Jeffrey Epstein is required in order to impeach Trump. If you only care about his impeachment in order to remove him from office and possibly jail him under US Federal and state laws, multiple grounds for that already exist just since he took office in January 2025. These grounds have nothing to do with any prior impeachment effort, Epstein or his first term. Would you be happy to pursue his impeachment on these grounds, not the unproven and inaccessible Epstein-related claims?
The fact that you subscribe to the output of the Krassenstein's explains the nature of your post.