Indeed; using the crooks' terminology only re-asserts the fraudulent narrative.
In that case, please, do not call the lethal injections "gene therapy." These injections maim and kill, so they are bioweapons, not "therapy." However, they are anything but "ineffective": they have been developed and tested in the secret labs worldwide for decades, so they deliver EXACTLY as expected.
By now, ALL "vaccines" have been proven to be ONLY toxic, because they are based on fake science (Germ Theory). It's irrelevant fiddling with definitions, because the whole theater of "modern medicine" is a scam:
Also, gene-altering tech is unlikely to be in the injections, although it would be possible, because the technology has been around since the early 1970s:
No "virus" and no "antibody" has ever been isolated from an "infected" person, and even the existence of "viral infection" has never been proven. "Covid" itself cannot be diagnosed in any honest and consistent way (well, it exists only in computer simulations).
It's a lot more important to ask what has been causing the symptoms:
Only "lethal injection" "bioweapon" are the terms I use, as opposed to the other two terms. There are literally hundreds, if not thousands of sources for these terms.
In effect, they are your terms that people are free to reject due to lack of reference.
"Gene therapy" is both a recognised, formally defined term and class of medical products and it is in fact what the manufacturers and the FDA have themselves classified these products as, and there's a documentary reference for it.
I didn't invent or select the term. The FDA and the manufacturers did.
And that's the whole point of using the term. It's unassailable because it is theirs.
I believe, I have explained what's wrong with these terms. It makes no difference who is using or "recognizing" them.
Using the terminology of those, who want to harm you (that is, again, well-documented) only keeps the fraudulent narrative alive. The narrative is, apparently, an essential tool of the global bankers' striving for total control and depopulation. Both are in progress; again, there is plenty of evidence of both, much of it from WEF etc. resources that don't even try to hide it from, as Hillary Clinton phrased it based on Schwab, the "useless eaters." Independent labs confirm that the injections are anything but "therapy," and the depopulation is in progress:
Indeed; using the crooks' terminology only re-asserts the fraudulent narrative.
In that case, please, do not call the lethal injections "gene therapy." These injections maim and kill, so they are bioweapons, not "therapy." However, they are anything but "ineffective": they have been developed and tested in the secret labs worldwide for decades, so they deliver EXACTLY as expected.
By now, ALL "vaccines" have been proven to be ONLY toxic, because they are based on fake science (Germ Theory). It's irrelevant fiddling with definitions, because the whole theater of "modern medicine" is a scam:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-disaster-of-modern-medicine
Also, gene-altering tech is unlikely to be in the injections, although it would be possible, because the technology has been around since the early 1970s:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna
No "virus" and no "antibody" has ever been isolated from an "infected" person, and even the existence of "viral infection" has never been proven. "Covid" itself cannot be diagnosed in any honest and consistent way (well, it exists only in computer simulations).
It's a lot more important to ask what has been causing the symptoms:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/proof-of-genocide
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/evidence-that-covid-symptoms-came
But what is your reference for any noun you have just used?
Please, explain your question.
The terms you used include:
Lethal injection
Bioweapon
Gene-altering tech
"Vaccine"
What is the reference point for using any of those terms, and why are you using 4 different terms?
Only "lethal injection" "bioweapon" are the terms I use, as opposed to the other two terms. There are literally hundreds, if not thousands of sources for these terms.
They describe current phenomena quite accurately.
But they have no documentary reference.
In effect, they are your terms that people are free to reject due to lack of reference.
"Gene therapy" is both a recognised, formally defined term and class of medical products and it is in fact what the manufacturers and the FDA have themselves classified these products as, and there's a documentary reference for it.
I didn't invent or select the term. The FDA and the manufacturers did.
And that's the whole point of using the term. It's unassailable because it is theirs.
The same cannot be said for yours.
I believe, I have explained what's wrong with these terms. It makes no difference who is using or "recognizing" them.
Using the terminology of those, who want to harm you (that is, again, well-documented) only keeps the fraudulent narrative alive. The narrative is, apparently, an essential tool of the global bankers' striving for total control and depopulation. Both are in progress; again, there is plenty of evidence of both, much of it from WEF etc. resources that don't even try to hide it from, as Hillary Clinton phrased it based on Schwab, the "useless eaters." Independent labs confirm that the injections are anything but "therapy," and the depopulation is in progress:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-not-fall-for-false-hope
You don't seem to have read a single word of my articles.