Back Test: The Spartacus Letter
Rev. 4 (2021-10-11)
The Spartacus Letter was published in September 2021 (rev 2). Rev 4 (Oct 21) contains 602 references, most of which were scientific publications. It sought to lay out what was then known about SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19 and the gene therapies.
It comprised the following sections:
COVID-19 Pathophysiology
COVID-19 Treatments
COVID-19 Transmission
COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers
COVID-19 Criminal Conspiracy
COVID-19 Vaccine Development and Links to Transhumanism
Conclusions
Does it pass a back test? If it does, this means that in 2021 people knew enough by then to adequately and correctly inform policy from that point, if not before.
In large part, the Spartacus Letter does pass the back test. Apart from the fact that it was heavily referenced, its discursive conclusion holds up and increasing amounts of political agenda, policy and events bolster those conclusions.
Probably the most contentious aspects of the letter centre around the Covid gene therapy links to Transhumanism, but the letter itself acknowledges this from the outset:
This section deals with some more speculative aspects of the pandemic and the medical and scientific establishment’s reaction to it, as well as the disturbing links between scientists involved in vaccine research and scientists whose work involved merging nanotechnology with living cells.
Also, its links between Covid and tyranny in various forms is up for general debate, save for the fact that since Covid, governments and corporations have fascistically worked together in “Lock step” to “Build Back Better” in line with WEF and Rockefeller published strategies, but that’s just a coincidence and as this early “factcheck” claimed, Spartacus’ claims were “mostly false”, right?
Let us remind ourselves of the Rockefeller Foundation’s May 2010 “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, which defined “Lock step” as:
LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian ladership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.
and detailed a scenario based around a 2012 pandemic (our emphasis):
Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
In 2012, the MERS “epidemic” popped up then promptly self-extinguished, having followed SARS-CoV “epidemic”. SARS-CoV-2 was the third in the Coronavirus run and the third time was the “pandemic” charm. It could appear as though elites have taken the Rockefeller’s vision and in general terms used it to inform methods of maximising their own political benefit while minimising citizens’ ability to push back. Indeed, the legal and commercial frameworks that gave rise to most of the political and legally enforceable pandemic management were either decades in the making or brought in at lightspeed in the midst of fear and panic, in true disaster capitalism style. Nations literally tore up long standing epidemic and pandemic management plans that were based on large amounts of knowledge then promptly set about implementing invented policies that transferred wealth at Warp Speed.
If you have not read the Spartacus Letter, VST urges you to read it. If you have, then VST urges you to revisit it. Either way, it will avail you of a comprehensive enough overview of the big picture of the pandemic and systemic issues which are playing out, including war with China.
It is likely that you will be disturbed at how a single document so succinctly drew together most of the aspects of the pandemic back in 2021, and how much more evidence has come to light to support the Spartacus Letter’s content since its publication.
Their motives are clear and obvious to anyone who has been paying attention. These megalomaniacs have raided the pension funds of the free world. Wall Street is insolvent and has had an ongoing liquidity crisis since the end of 2019. The aim now is to exert total, full-spectrum physical, mental, and financial control over humanity before we realize just how badly we’ve been extorted by these maniacs.
6th May, 2023 Zerohedge: "It's Spooky": Stanford Professor Warns Thousands Of US Banks Are "Potentially Insolvent"
2nd May, 2023 The Telegraph: Half of America’s banks are potentially insolvent – this is how a credit crunch begins
18 March, 2023 NY Post: Nearly 200 banks at risk for same fate as SVB: study
If ever you are challenged for sources related to the pandemic, start solely with this letter (copy downloadable below). No one is going to be able to refute most of the 602 references it contains, especially now because significant amounts of the letter have begun to penetrate the mainstream propaganda.
The Spartacus Letter doesn’t go as far as speculative issues around fertility, birth rates, shot contamination with genetic material (it mentions GO and references metallic contamination), and mutagenic/carcinogenic effects of gene therapy ingredients as per The End of Hope Hypothesis. Even now, the Spartacus Letter still provides a cogent framework for how we got/get* to hell in a handbasket.
*Delete as appropriate depending upon how long you think The Road to Hell is (Part 1 = 4:53, Part 2 = 4:30).
Despite its publication and its express commitment, our destination remains the same.
It is the opinion of ICENI, and other independent researchers, that the world’s governments are covertly engaged in an act of genocide against their own populations. This will not be tolerated. To those who are participating in this disgusting farce without any understanding of what they are doing, we have one word for you. Stop. You are causing irreparable harm to your country and to your fellow citizens.
To those who may be reading this warning and have full knowledge and understanding of what they are doing and how it will unjustly harm millions of innocent people, we have a few more words. Damn you to hell. You will not destroy America and the Free World, and you will not have your New World Order. We will make certain of that.
Spartacus publishes at the ICENI substack and is worth keeping an eye on.
Much appreciate this review/analysis and the encouragement to spread awareness of Spartacus' valuable work mapping The (Parasite / Psychopathic Overclass)'s war against the sane and healthy. Besides writing, he speaks very well. Links to his podcasts and appearances on shows like McCairnDojo.com can be found on his Substack.
That Kirk Douglas guy could really write. He got the future pretty well figured out. I have read the letter, but it was pretty much Greek at the time. Now it makes a whole lot of sense. I downloaded the Rocky Crocky thing, but don't know if I care to read 50 pages of pure poppycock.