The Context of Conflict

Big picture politics tells us what to expect.

Fascistic agendas openly state that mankind in its present size, state and spectrum of behaviour is the primary threat to the wellbeing of the form of mankind that those fascists deem acceptable and desirable. There’s too many of us doing not enough of what the fascists want, how they want it.

The proof of this is in the global policies being implemented around health, medicine, food, climate, COVID and conflict. All of these policies drive to one thing, and one thing alone: less people living more restricted lives, all of whom are increasingly subservient to fascism.

What this tells us is that the value of human life is, in the eyes of the fascists, declining at an increasing rate. There are clear published prices. If you die as a result of a COVID gene therapy, in Britain you get between nothing and a maximum of £120,000 if those you leave behind can prove 60%+ disablement or death was caused solely by the gene therapy. This is so hard to do that pay out is unlikely, meaning those lives are priced at zero. The value of human life in Britain is the same as it is in the poorest corners of the globe, by policy design and political and legal conduct of the state. The kick back benefit of killing people for nothing is that their deaths trigger asset release and tax payments to the state, as well as alleviating the state of impending or current social obligations such as welfare and medical care. Therefore, on a net basis, democide when there are “too many” useless eaters is a profitable exercise for those who are plugged in to the financial matrix of the Soylent Green production line.

In this context, conflict is good in three ways:

1. It opens the door to management by fear and chaos, which is also known as Disaster Capitalism, within which is the ability to implement policy for otherwise unjustifiable reasons, see Pearl Harbour, false flags, the PATRIOT ACT, COVID etc.

2. It enables the more rapid achievement of political objectives.

3. It is literally a profit centre in which wealth is transferred via or from citizens who will be killed now or soon.

In our fictional piece, Baseliners - How the war was won, we wrote:

It didn't take that long for people to get hooked on the new slogans, which were timed to cover the deaths. Then the masters twisted the hollow, insane slogans and repackaged the grief of the deaths into a weird, sacrificial reverie. People lapped it up. Possibly the virtue signalling equivalent of Munchausen’s-by-proxy.

To think that there could be an even deeper level to it all.

Meat consumption must go down to save the planet! Meat consumption must stop!

They were the headline slogans.

“Fucking cows! Sodding swine! Fuck off!” screamed the rent-a-crowd out of the screen to the faces bathed in its light. Tracing Orwell, “MEAT” became synonymous with “HATE”.

…

Then the illogic turned.

But it's meat that eats meat.

They put that out there for a couple of weeks. On its own, it was too abstract for many to fully comprehend at first, even though they were already so far along the road to hell. Then the reinforcement came via some barely veiled output from stooge economists on intellectual news shows and in The Economist and The Spectator. These shills dressed up the crux of this latest “meat eats meat” slogan as a complex demand-side problem so that people could feel “clever” and righteous by association. But to stay clever, they had to agree with the slogan’s extreme corollary, which they didn't at first fathom or understand because they weren’t really clever.

“The threat of meat-eating to the planet is a demand-side problem”, parroted the middle classes, claiming moral and intellectual superiority by copying the TV.

…

“MEAT EATS MEAT!”, chanted the scared working classes. They had largely stopped eating real meat due to the radical prices and shelf space given over to synth - a blend of soy, Quorn and other “plant based” engineering whose ingredients were only described via impenetrable, proprietary trademarks like ChloroProtein and VeggieBite.

…

Then they closed the loop of illogic.

Stop the meat that does the eating.

Once that slogan was released, that was carte blanch to stop medical treatment for anyone, natural or unnatural, over 50 except for acute A&E-type care. No chronic conditions, no cancer, nothing. Health care overload was used to reinforce the slogan, but the hospitals were kept empty, even on skeleton staff.

Then the deeper insanity kicked in. All levels of community from families outwards began to see death of the meat-eating “meat” as a virtuous self-sacrifice for the greater good. Thus, accelerating this through the suspension of health care to the old unnaturals was “the right and only thing to do”. Old unnaturals were caught between age, the lingering and persistent side effects of the endless boosters and basic malnutrition that, all combined, stopped them recovering from anything or brought on other ills that accumulated quickly and were ignored. The remaining young unnaturals virtue-signalled by way of grief top trumps. It used to be, “Have you had your jab? I've had my jab. What jab did you get? I got blah. Have you had your boosters yet? I've had blah. Mix ‘n match? Would've been worse. Lucky they'd had it…”. They couldn't cope with the tactical questions though. That was the fastest way to shut them down, although some imploded and some exploded. Most mentally shut down when they were asked to make logical, coherent, joined up sense of the slogans.

The bodies, old or young (all unnatural by this point) were all cremated - in keeping with the insanity - and no one added 1 and 1 or batted an eyelid at the carbon footprint of the crematoriums. Global average lifespans started plummeting but the graphs didn't exist anymore so people didn’t know it was happening at scale. The memory hole had a vacuum cleaner running at full power bolted on to it, hoovering up numbers and memories and sense and morals and ethics.

The above is essentially what is now happening at increasing speed across multiple fronts.

Under the climate banner, the entirety of the Western world and some of the rest of the globe is literally being told:

• Meat consumption must go down to save the planet! Meat consumption must stop!

  • Eating actual, natural meat, is wrong, damaging and must be stopped.

• But it's meat that eats meat.

  • You - the meat that eats the meat - are the cause of the world’s problems, and so must conform to what the Masters i.e. fascists, command you to do, which largely comprises conforming to extreme wealth transfer as laid out in WEF plans.

• Stop the meat that does the eating.

  • Farming must stop unless it is done directly by fascists on a centralized basis, even though this is guaranteed to lead to famine. The point of this demand is to cause famine and failing health in the majority of the population (see Mao’s China).

  • Control of food and water is control of a population, even if it takes a while to achieve. Control over health is the same. Combine them and you have achieved a captive and dependent population who must and will comply.

  • By driving people towards accelerated death, you create a bunch of customers from whom you extract their last physical and material wealth. See conflict casualties requiring treatment and prosthetics, anyone who is ill or malnourished who requires some form of treatment.

Meanwhile, circa 550,000 people have been killed in Ukraine and conflict is rising in Russian border regions, the Middle East and potentially Africa. The highest levels of the USA, EU, UK and other Five Eyes nations have all explicitly stated that the Ukraine massacre is “value for money” conflict that uses cheap lives to fight a war over there instead of “over here” even though that statement is unbacked nonsense that requires people to believe that Russia et al are going to invade other nations and enslave them somehow. There is no evidence backing this claim and Russia is not capable of performing such a task. The Ukraine war is not cheap or value for money, compared to the rejected alternatives over the last decade plus.

The response to burgeoning or actual conflict is always head-on conflict in place of any other option, notably diplomacy, negotiation and compromise in the pursuit of peace and the avoidance of death. Therefore, mass deaths are one of the objectives of the fascists presiding over those conflicts.

Those nations attempting to arbitrate present conflicts are not the West. They are members of the Global South/majority, for obvious reasons.

In the USA now, there is the open acknowledgement of:

• The complete incapability to directly fight a peer foe e.g. Russia or China with present manpower and armouries. Casualty estimates come in at 3600 dead per day in a direct engagement with such forces. These estimates mean that the entire US hegemony cannot sustain a projected peer level conflict for more than months before being exhausted into more extremes of mass forced draft, while still being radically constrained by materiel.

• A major and increasing military recruitment problem across the board caused by physical incapability, unfitness and infirmities. This includes the deleterious effects of COVID gene therapies, lifestyle, and psychosocial phenomena.

• The potential need for forced draft against lower standards to raise the size of US military forces.

Across the EU and Five Eyes, there is probably the historically lowest amount of deployable manpower and equipment there has ever been since WW2, which is at direct odds with the political rhetoric of conflict. Now, money is a direct substitute for military power in conflict zones because force and armaments have been burned (see Ukraine). Money is not a substitute for soldiers and stuff when a real fight kicks off.

The political rhetoric’s mismatch with published admissions of capability grows. This mismatch is not apparent in peer “foes” of Russia and China, who nominally have adequate capability to actively defend their immediate territorial and security interests or are on the curve to maintain that capability, or at least are careful to deliberately output narrative that states this is the case, which has not been credibly debunked by the West. Meanwhile, the West does the exact opposite and does not appear to be bluffing in its admissions of dwindling capability set in the context of socio-political and economic stress and decline.

Embedded in the nature of these escalating conflicts is the threat of a nuclear event or war. VST was in conversation regarding Israel Palestine, during which someone expressed the concern about Israel’s nukes. VST pointed out the following:

• Nuclear weapons serve two purposes:

  • They are a force backstop that enables the wielder to exert terminal threat against adversaries and means of leverage over allies and adversaries alike, irrespective of the true intent to use them or the net outcome of their use;

  • They are actually “God’s weapon” that exists to fulfil their stated function of mass destruction, should someone deem their release to be somehow justified or compelled.

• In the case of Israel’s illegal nuclear weapons, one must consider both purposes’ value and feasibility.

  • If Israel launched nukes, where would they go to be of meaningful use? Not Palestine or the immediate surrounding area due to the consequences of fall out. This largely rules out actually attacking most of the Middle East using a significantly sized warhead, and therefore most of Israel’s immediate enemies.

  • By possessing nukes and being under threat, Israel gains political, military and political leverage over its allies (“support us or we’ll nuke someone”, “support us or the nukes risk being taken”) and can issue nuclear threats to its enemies (“don’t push us”). If you believe that nuclear blackmail does not occur between allies and adversaries alike, think again. Look around and you will find accounts of the threat of a nuclear strike being instrumental in the freezing of the Korean war and possibly underpinning aspects of Israel’s relationship with the USA by way of Israeli threats to set off a nuclear false flag against Russia.

• In the context of Israel’s precarious position in the face of increasing Arabian conflict, its nukes make it a massive liability that compels the USA and other international players to protect it in order to head off their capture and potential radical shift in the balance of power. This is useful to Israel in ensuring its protection and sponsorship.

Prediction for conflict

Given the above, VST predicts that no matter what, global conflict will increase and the body count with it because the political objectives of significant parts of the developed world subscribe to the eradication of mankind back to a scale they deem desirable. This has already been initiated via gene therapies and the Ukraine war, which is arming other wars and destabilisation (see Sweden’s collapse). Despite any rhetoric telling us otherwise, the actions of fascists is to foment, provoke and escalate conflict, instead of the opposite, even when they have the increasingly limited means to prosecute effective war where they stand a chance to conventionally win.

The majority of populations are not using their numbers to stop this. Instead, people hop their binary brains from the last old thing to the next current thing. They may talk around aspects of the above and there are awake and cynical elements, but there are no mass objections that seek to force out the fascists and reject the key parts of their plan in a meaningful and increasingly rapid way. The proof of this is the simple achievement of WEF plans despite people knowing that they are not of benefit for the majority.

Killing each other under largely false pretexts instead of doing the hard work of genuine peace-making is both the distraction of divide and conquer that protects the fascists by keeping the masses busy and away from them, and the direct pursuance of population reduction and wealth transfer into the transition from one socio-political and financial paradigm to another.

Both sides of war are always sponsored by those who profit from it. The US hegemony is a fundamental war economy that cannot be changed in short order with a policy promise here or there. The energy and interests in that system are gigantic, which guarantees this state of affairs will persist for a long time and in that time, the use of war to achieve other fascistic objectives will occur. That war will cover overt conflicts and increasing amounts of covert warfare including insurgency, coups and the like, in the face of declining real military power while the time needed to remilitarise at the expense of one’s people ticks by.

It is VST’s suspicion that increasing amounts of open, destructive and armed conflict will be seen across the EU in the next five years and the political bloc will be radically restructured by implosion, not by careful stewardship. VST believes that the EU’s political management infrastructure should be removed and EU nations revert to bilateral relationships based on the existing administrative framework with the absolute minimum central body overseeing those rules, akin to WTO arrangements. On that basis, business and degrees of movement can continue as they do today, absent the toxic and corrupt fascism at the heart of the EU’s administration. From there, Europe as a continent can be rebuilt, nation by nation and independent of the US. Economic collapse will combine over the next five years with the increasing realisation of the true damage of COVID gene therapies and the corruption at its heart, as well as the falsehood of the climate narrative. It will take at least that long for average Joes to begin to entertain what the presently awake minority understand. Between then and now, the skilful will have positioned themselves to be near the front of the various queues into that new order. The fascists are already fully focused on stopping this by their use of totalitarian means of information and perception control across the US hegemony. This tells you that they perceive the same potential outcomes. If they didn’t they wouldn’t be expending time and effort in these areas as they wait for the full scale of gene therapy debilitation to take effect and further reduce and cripple the 99%’s capability to fight.

The question then becomes whether or not a populist insurgency of sufficient efficacy will take hold before the masses become rendered fully compliant.

Even the system, powerful though it was, could not physically police and contain major uprisings in the unnatural population, for they were almost everyone. The Australian natural skirmishes would be nothing compared to what could be unleashed if the unnaturals were woken from dreams to find themselves in a living nightmare. The unnaturals were the troops, the police, the medics, the sysadmins, the corporate media technicians and talking heads; they were the entire labour force, supply chain and all of the demand; they were all the nodes through which the money flowed from the Central Banks and back to the masters. So the Baseliners’ strategy presented the system with its own Catch-22: recognise each Baseliner’s evidence-based case and deal with it transparently through the legal system; or deny them illegitimately, reveal the hellish delusion too early and awaken the global mob.

Baseliners - How the war was won

What is the Ukrainian conflict? Some might say:

It’s not war, just the end of love.