Proof of Dunning Kruger & Milgram
NZ medics prove their own knowing and unknowing useful idiocy
They all told us, and are still telling us, that the #Covid19 shots are safe and effective for pregnant and breastfeeding women, but Pfizer's own documents, which the FDA and #Pfizer wanted to remain hidden until 2096, tell a very different story. After trawling through various videos and webinars from 2021, I made this montage of what we were all told here in New Zealand about the #Pfizer mRNA shot being safe for pregnant and breast feeding women, juxtaposed with what Pfizer's own documents tell us.
Rumble user CoronavirusPlushie
Please support Rumble and this user by clicking here to watch a very well edited montage of useful idiot NZ medics shilling for the Covid narrative and likely committing fraud and medical negligence.
What you will see is NZ medics asserting “safe and effective” for women, foetuses and infants, without reference to a single specific piece of evidence. Many of the claims are utterly ridiculous. One nurse claims that all the ingredients occur “naturally in the body” except for PEG, which is a lie. She states that PEG is a lipid that occurs all over the place in many products including food. Go to 05:36 to hear this:
“Because these vaccines are so basic, it only has the mRNA, so that’s your active ingredient and then you’ve just got fats, sugars and salts… the other excipients are found naturally in the body other than the PEG, which is a manmade lipid - fat - and that’s found really in lots of things like cosmetics, some foods unfortunately, and lots of day-to-day products that we use. All those other ingredients are naturally found.”
Bronwyn Robinson, Nurse
COVID-19 Immunisation Education Facilitator - IMAC
Robinson is multiply wrong. She was also clearly reading from a script. Per the NZ patient information and EMA’s EPAR document on Pfizer’s gene therapy:
6.1 List of excipients
((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) (ALC-0315)*
2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159)*
1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)
Cholesterol
Potassium chloride
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate
Sodium chloride
Disodium phosphate dihydrate
Sucrose
Water for injections
Sodium hydroxide (for pH adjustment)
Hydrochloric acid (for pH adjustment)
* Novel proprietary compounds
The above immediately shows that Bronwyn Robinson was making false statements.
Regarding Pregnancy etc, the EMA stated (our bold):
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
A large amount of observational data from pregnant women vaccinated with Comirnaty during the second and third trimester have not shown an increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes. While data on pregnancy outcomes following vaccination during the first trimester are presently limited, no increased risk for miscarriage has been seen. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development (see section 5.3). Comirnaty can be used during pregnancy.
Breast-feeding
No effects on the breastfed newborn/infant are anticipated since the systemic exposure of breast-feeding woman to Comirnaty is negligible. Observational data from women who were breast-feeding after vaccination have not shown a risk for adverse effects in breastfed newborns/infants. Comirnaty can be used during breast-feeding.
Fertility
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity (see section 5.3).
Just the above shows that it is not justfied to make most of the statements that these medics make. Even though the medics were likely to have not had access to Pfizer’s trial data, they still had access to regulatory documents such as the EMA document, which clearly reads ambiguously.
Juxtaposed with these medics are journalist Sonia Elijah and Dr. Naomi Wolf flagging primary data and findings in Pfizer’s own trials, up to 2021, as well as pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole and cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, discussing pathology and research findings. This data proves that regulators and Pfizer knew that the mRNA caused issues in women and infants and therefore lied to the public. Therefore, these NZ medics’ claims and assertions are false, unbacked and/or uninformed. Most of the stuff you will hear beggars belief regardless of Pfizer’s evidence to the contrary because of the way that the assertions are made.
This is evidence of:
Capture - some of these people may have been literally bribed, employed or ideologically convinced to make such statements.
Dunning Kruger effect - they literally do not realise how poorly informed they are and choose to express unsubstantiated assertions that, without evidence, rely on their authority and positions to carry weight amongst each other and the lay audience. All of their claims are wrong. On the simplest level, they were only in a position to say, “there is either no or inconclusive evidence that these gene therapies are conclusively safe and sufficiently effective for women, foetuses and infants.”
Milgram - lay audiences who believed these assertions likely had little to no ability to directly challenge them and request evidence. Therefore, may will have believed these “authority” figures and acted in line with the assertions, encouragements and instructions.
It is strange that so many people have committed statements to video that are wrong, where they may well carry liability. It is VST’s hope that legal action is pursued against all of the people in the video in NZ and against anyone globally who was so negligent.
Soniah Elijah’s substack is here:
Naomi Wolf’s substack is here:
Read more from the Pfizer files via Naomi Wolf’s Daily Clout here.
Yeah, absolutely unbelievable. There's more to it than just stupidity.