Let's assume that this hasn't been misleadingly or nefariously edited, and that the cuts haven't left out crucial information.
Let's also ignore the woman who doesn't speak but is focused on at the end.
Let's focus on the woman who speaks.
If the edit is to be believed, she is the one who objects to mandate, demands bodily autonomy and then, when asked about vaccine mandates, says, “I don't know.”
To boil this down as simply as possible, we simply ask, “do you stand for the right to bodily autonomy?”
You don't need to “know” about anything else. Everything else still remains the final choice of the individual.
Including euthanasia.
If you stand for bodily autonomy but you “don't know” about vaccine mandates, you've forgotten to do some thinking.
But if you think that this is a new era in history, you need to look at the use of vaccine mandates in smallpox and ask yourself where the limits of bodily autonomy might lie?
Hypocrisy