Calm before the storm?
We are always moving into a "new normal". It's the rate of progression that feels abnormal
Guest writer and one time punch-drunk boxer, Ardal “Two Jabs” Moloughney, casts his one working eye over the bigger picture with a loose grip on on an air ticket.
The world, like the best fighter, is in perpetual motion. Life happening on that world moves with it. Nothing is static, change is inevitable. “Normal” is a highly relative and temporally dependent concept that is totally fluid when it comes to human society and the politics that drive it.
Is the world moving back to normal? It looks like it, doesn’t it?
Withdrawn May 27, 2022: New recommendations for primary and community health care providers in England
While there is little sign as yet of NHS hospitals dropping their mask rules, at least one private hospital has returned to mask-free normality. Will the NHS follow?
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/06/01/hospital-drops-mask-requirement-will-others-follow/
AZ vaccine-induced Guillain Barré Syndrome
More AZ issues are being admitted to now. Hands up anyone who can find a clear and determinate explanation of how, why, where, when and to whom vaccine-induced GBS will happen. If that doesn’t exist, how do we know how many more people will develop it and what the effect of multiple boosters or untested and unknown pharmacodynamics will have on GBS cases? I mean, we tested Covid-19 vaccines when mixed with loads of other stuff, didn’t we? Like the flu jab, and vanilla essence?
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/astrazeneca-coronavirus-vaccine-guillain-barre-27093397
Canada recognises pilot Ross Wightman’s vaccine-induced GBS and awards a payment (capped at $248,000) with eligibility for income payments (capped at $90,000). These are reflections of the value that the Canadian state puts on citizen’s lives. It’s shockingly low and hard to get, like Prince Naseem in his heyday.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-man-vaccine-injury-payout-1.6472636
Meanwhile, what’s the state of play with vaccine injury compensation in the UK? Doughnut, anyone?
Life Down Under
In New ZeroCovidLand:
The NZDSOS doctors point to 500 deaths close to the Covid-19 vaccination, which particularly affect young people, including several 13-year-olds. Of course, one cannot always assume that each of these deaths was caused by the experimental gene vaccination. Nobody claims that either. Rather, comprehensive, complete autopsies, investigations and honest enlightenment are required. The authorities, especially the police, are asked to investigate to protect the population. Reference is also made to the work of statisticians who were able to prove that the accumulation of unexpected deaths correlates with the respective vaccination campaigns.
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/29/nzdsos-on-deaths-following-vaccination/
And NZ pilots start looking for cash to go to court:
“Flying in Freedom NZ” has launched a public appeal for help to fund a legal challenge against vaccine mandates in the workplace. The funding page can be found here. The significance of this legal challenge is that any judgement will have implications for vaccine mandates in all private workplaces in NZ.
Pre-Covid, Air NZ employed around 2,000 pilots, making it the largest single employer of pilots in NZ. The group of airline industry staff that comprise “Flying in Freedom NZ” include pilots, ground crew, engineers and flight attendants.
Let’s not ignore the Prison Continent:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1532307975268110337.html
“Two Jabs” Does Science - Myocarditis & Pericarditis
Here is a clear, globally repeated statement:
Take the vaccine because your chances of myocarditis/pericarditis are higher post-Covid infection than post-Covid vaccination.
Almost everyone claiming to be a doctor who backed the jabs
This was even stated by the Principal Medical Officer of the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Dr. Kate Manderson. Her statements have been immortalised on video for others to judge their veracity, longevity and degree of hubris and patronisation. She instructed pilots to take the vaccine in spite of known vaccine-induced myocarditis and pericarditis risk.
Here is an Israeli large population study of the incidence of post-Covid infection myocarditis/pericarditis in an unvaccinated cohort of over 190,000 infected people against a control group:
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219
Retrospective cohort study of 196,992 adults after COVID-19 infection in Clalit Health Services members in Israel between March 2020 and January 2021…The control cohort of 590,976 adults with at least one negative PCR and no positive PCR were age- and sex-matched…Nine post-COVID-19 patients developed myocarditis (0.0046%), and eleven patients were diagnosed with pericarditis (0.0056%). In the control cohort, 27 patients had myocarditis (0.0046%) and 52 had pericarditis (0.0088%)… Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis (aHR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.56) or pericarditis (aHR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.13). We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.
Note, this study acknowledges that previous studies claimed to have found higher m/p incidence post infection, but makes clear the following:
Higher risk of myocarditis (risk ratio, 18.28; 95% CI, 3.95 to 25.12; risk difference, 11.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 5.6 to 15.8) and pericarditis was observed in a large population study of recently published by Barda et al. [12]. Although both our study and the study by Barda et al. are based on Clalit Health Service patients, there are several important differences between the studies. Barda et al. were focused on COVID-19 vaccination, and thus the matching was designed to neutralize vaccination-related factors, while our study is on a non-vaccinated population. Barda et al. studied the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis from positive PCR results up to 42 days, while we study recovering patients starting 10 days after infection and for a significantly more prolonged time. Barda et al.’s analysis also ignores the timing of myocarditis and pericarditis. Finally, while Barda et al. have included many causes of myocarditis and pericarditis, we only included acute myocarditis and pericarditis in hospitalized patients which is more likely to be accurate.
Here’s Barda’s paper:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34432976/
You can do the reading and comparison of method and validity yourself to reach your own conclusions, but ask yourself this:
What evidence was Manderson actually referring to when asserting supposed post-infection m/p risk, before claiming that pilots should take the vaccines in spite of their m/p health risks? Don’t we have a right and a need to see the evidence that informed her recommendations?
For the record, AUS CASA and Manderson have been questioned in writing about her claims and they have both totally stonewalled the requests.
However, force of international numbers, global publicity and this latest study are opportunities to go back to CASA and Manderson en masse and demand that they show their working out for why they forced every Australian pilot to take unnecessary risks. Rinse and repeat for Canada, and you might as well drop the CAA a line as well. Mandate or no mandate, a majority of pilots have likely been double or triple jabbed in the UK. What risks are they all running?
Something to remember: Internationalisation
Do you think you can only ask questions of your nation’s authorities? Why?
Air travel is international. As a passenger or an aviation employee, you are subject to international and foreign regulation.
If you are a passenger on a jab mandate airline (past or present) you have exactly zero chance of being flown or served by someone who carries no vaccine-induced risk. That’s a monopoly on risk that you are subject to and have potentially no control over, which was created by what is effectively market manipulation by both the regulator and the market players. It’s also irreversible.
Therefore, one day, it might be worth you thinking about getting together and using your voice and your knowledge to demand answers from aviation operators, regulators and actors all over the globe.
What have you got to lose?
Reality has departed, replaced by their reality
Pfizergate has taken an interesting turn as Brooke Jackson, Pfizer whistle-blower, brings a case to court that the pharma giant seeks to have dismissed. Check out the tweet thread above (first tweet censored by Twitter) for a glimpse inside a box marked “Bizarre”.
What you are looking at is the same thing that is in play in aviation: defence by consensus amongst those who control the narrative and the reality that flows from it. If enough agents with power repeat something, it becomes truth. If enough of those people also ignore or deny something, it becomes a falsehood. If they also cover each other’s backs in legislation, practise and in court, they can do what they like and you get to swallow what they give you.
In this case, Pfizer’s lawyers seek to have the case dismissed because it claims that the nature of the government contract essentially allowed it to lie to the government:
In its motion to dismiss, Pfizer stated that the regulations don’t apply to its vaccine contract with the U.S. Department of Defense because the agreement was executed under the department’s Other Transaction Authority (OTA), which gives contract holders the ability to skirt many rules and laws that typically apply to contracts.
That means that Jackson’s claim that Pfizer must still comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation “is simply wrong,” according to Pfizer.
Warner Mendenhall, a lawyer who is working on Jackson’s case, said in a recent interview that Pfizer has “clearly not followed federal procurement laws.”
“And now they’re saying, ‘Of course we didn’t follow federal procurement laws, we didn’t have to—this was just for a prototype,'” he said.
“Normal” is never coming back because it was never really there
Like it or not, there is no return. Legislation has changed across the globe. We are in the New Something now and always have been.
Lessons have been learned by those whose ambitions were temporarily thwarted this time around. People who get to the top didn’t get there by being timid, self-less quitters. Problems are challenges to be overcome by the continued, focused application of time, co-ordinated effort and resources.
It doesn’t matter if this load of jabs didn’t work, you’re still already in a UK Digital ID system. You’re already in a hyperinflationary, global economic collapse that paves the way for CBDCs. You’re already looking at the release “outbreak” of a likely modified, more-transmissible-in-humans clade of monkeypox, for which the NHS has deliberately changed its long-standing online guidance last month.
Genetically engineered monkeypox hit the shelves in time for Christmas, just like Uncle Buck Bill said it would. And this time, “everyone’s going to notice.” Are you going to be looking at a countdown to Christmas or another count up of “cases”. Wholesale banana prices are up 16% since January.
The question is, are you going to do things the same as you have been doing, or are you going to adapt and evolve like those at the top, in time for winter?
They aren’t backing off. They aren’t leaving you alone. You. Have. Not. Won.
Here are some clues:
Deputy Director, Delivery Lead Covid Pass -
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/Vaccinate-the-world-in-six-months
But when an outbreak is threatening to go global, we won’t have years. So we need ways to speed up the process without sacrificing the safety and effectiveness that people have come to expect from vaccines.
Even with my ring-acquired brain fog, I can see how loaded these two sentences are. You could replace all that with, “we’ll make you do what we want, when we want and as fast as possible, while all of us chant ‘Safe! Effective!’ in time to rhythmic clap.” Yes, it’s possible that the clap could result from such a future dosing strategy, along with many other infections and ailments, as we are seeing now.
The world should build on models like the RECOVERY trial in the U.K. It set up protocols for running drug trials in advance and built infrastructure that made it much easier to get started once COVID hit. In addition, the agencies that regulate vaccines need to agree ahead of time on how volunteers will be enrolled in trials and on the software tools that will enable people around the world to sign up as soon as the disease strikes. And by connecting diagnostic tests to the trial system, we can automatically suggest to doctors that their patients should join a trial if they’re eligible.
The RECOVERY trial may not be all that Uncle Bill would have us believe. If you fancy some fairly lengthy technical reading, indulge in these two FranceSoir teardowns. Personally, I’d rather take a battering around the ring.
https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-science-tech/oxford-recovery-are-data-hiding-deaths
Further, the level of assumption built in to trial enrolment are remarkable. “As soon as the disease strikes,” it wouldn’t be a pandemic. Monkeypox isn’t. Yet. Although it will be because it was designed to be. It’s been deployed on the day that the “simulation” stipulated. In this paradigm, the “system” is God. You connect a doctor as a mouthpiece of authority and then you connect a test subject. If God wants the subject, God tells the mouthpiece to tell the subject they should take part in a clinical trial.
If you think about it, no one should take part in a clinical trial unless they’ve got no less risky choices to cling to life. Everyone who took part in Covid clinical trials had perfectly serviceable lives (the trials picked only healthy people). None of them left the trial better off (health-wise or financially). This is partly why trials are so hard to recruit to, or done on poor or desperate or deluded people. At best, they’re trading unknown trial risks against terminal or severe disease risks in order to make risk benefit decision. At worst, they’ve been duped into it with a fake narrative, coerced, exploited or tricked. Why would you want to derogate your fully informed and risk assessed decision to Windows 11.23b and a USB Pattern Matcher MD?
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
Legislation and policy is the true trajectory
The only thing you really need to look at is the legislation. What piece of legislation introduced for things that you don’t like is being rescinded as Covid recedes in place of boxing puppets? Time for another doughnut, I think. If the legislation is there to enable something, that something IS happening.
We’ve all read the UK’s Digital Health and Care plans, haven’t we?
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-life-sciences-support/digital-health-and-care
Ding ding, round two!
Your coach’s advice in round one saw you get battered around the ring trying to keep your guard down and soak up punches on that big glass jaw. What will your tactics be this round?