Alex Berenson has just flagged a US National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin.
He gets all “me me me” about it, when actually, there's no need. It's about “us us us” and “them them them”, so I think he's bordering on some kind of messiah complex here but he's got books to sell and paid subscriptions to drum up.
Has he cleared up his false claims about Malone's role in mRNA tech development yet?
Here it is. Bit limited.
Anyway, the point Berenson flags is serious.
Here is the bulletin:
Here’s the juicy bit:
SUMMARY OF THE TERRORISM THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories...
Key factors contributing to the current heightened threat environment include:
The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine trust in US government institutions.
For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.
Wind the clocks back. It's winter 1984
That's that. For the G1 government to state in totally vague and undefined terms that talking about election fraud and Covid-19 is tantamount to supporting, fomenting or undertaking terrorism is the apex of one of this story's arcs.
From here, it's all downhill.
That makes every single person who you may have heard with evidence and justified opinions that Covid-19 politics, management, origin stories etc are up for challenge, a terrorist threat.
That would include Senators Rand Paul and Ron Johnson. They must be agents of some dark force, but it won’t be the Chinese this time because they are our partners in Covid, praised by that trusted institution, the WHO, and now totally out of mainstream criticism.
This is simply the evolution of tactics. “The end” of this does not exist, only a fight to drag the curve away from the minority's strategy and back towards the majority's interests.
Coming to other Five Eyes nations near you
The UK tracks and mirrors the US as it is a vassal state within the Five Eyes network with far less transparency and accountability than its master, the US. The master and its vassal use each other to spy on each other's populations in order to circumvent their own domestic spying restrictions. Old news but no one cares anymore because it's old news and their devices are their lives. They can't forego the convenience that fingering a screen to get a bag of flour delivered in 18 hours by a drone affords them.
At present, the Police Crime Bill, Coronavirus Act 2020, Online Safety Bill and Human Rights Act modifications are likely to all add up to a net of chilling restrictions. Even if the Police Crime Bill seems to have been delayed by the Lords, it will come back and be slipped into other forms of legislation. MI5 agents are already immune from prosecution so they can actively commit crime, which could possibly include fomenting it. This is like the FBI's MO on getting a vulnerable agent to recruit a patsy whom they then feed a plot, a plan and the means to do it then nick him/her/they/it just in the nick of time. Fancy that. Keeping a nation safe from domestic terror because you are actually the source of that domestic terror that you keep telling everyone about is nothing more than false flag manipulation AKA mis-/disinformation seeding and peddling of conspiracy theories and false narratives. Sound familiar?
I am willing to predict that, if it doesn't exist in an equivalent form already, this explicit classification of BS contained within the NTAS bulletin will appear in the UK within the next quarter, irrespective of what the state of Covid-19 restrictions are, and it will be used to justify another new or refloated bill. This may be bolstered by another coincident “serious crime” (there's already been two in the last year) carried out by someone who is instantly prejudicially labeled as anti narrative, anti vax, anti something. They'll probably just turn out to be someone's aunty.
Jean Charles de Menezes turned out to just be someone's uncle who was late for work and he had his head blown off and no one was accountable for it. The commander of that failed op was promoted and made a Dame.
Who determines what a false and true narrative is?
Evidently, fewer and fewer people.
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''
Source: New York Times, Ron Suskind - "Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush"
Eventually and soon, reality will be forced into your mouth and strapped secure around the back of your head in the form of a state sanctioned ball gag. You will then have to shout state sanctioned slogans at each other (more than you have already done) and the television while being watched by a state sanctioned and fitted camera, while your own devices check that you're shouting loud enough.
Self suppression is not the answer to this
If you think that avoiding heat by keeping your mouth shut and just thinking your stuff or whispering it to a few (while still surrounded by mobile phones and video surveillance cameras), you’re utterly wrong.
The only way through this is to call out fascism, authoritarianism and totalitarianism loud and clear.
Otherwise, you are not free and you are right now a slave.
You're free, aren't you? So there's no need for cowardice. Just exercise your freedom. While it exists. If it exists.
If you're not free, how are you planning on getting out of your chains? The slave ship is about to dock in its destination port and there's not a beach or a mojito in sight.
Not for us.