Regardless of where you live, it is important to become aware of any people in positions of power, access or resource on the right side of history, who can be supported, guided and involved in the right causes and given valuable information. That’s in the US, EU, UK and beyond. Thailand is doing something anti-narrative that is largely unheard of in the West. Go find out what Professor Sucharit Bhakdi has to say about it. It’s encouraging.
Within the UK political sphere, Andrew Bridgen MP is the only anti-narrative voice. As such, he has been castigated by the Conservative Party and cast out. Unshackled but on the outside, he is now the UK Reclaim Party’s only MP for the time being.
At the present time, party politics are not important.
Before Bridgen attracted the true ire of the system in the post COVID era, Chris Chope MP stood up for 30 seconds and said, “Can the UK’s Vaccine Damage Payments System be looked at to pay some more to more people?” to which the answer was a big fat “no”. That was the political theatre of micro-containment. The giveaway was that he started in a dead end - the UK’s VDPS that is a deliberate trap in which to catch and contain any threat to the pharma vaccine interests. But some credit is due to Chope for starting something in a maximally hostile and incriminated gaggle of scum. Chope remains a supporter of the vaccine injured, but he isn’t the same as Bridgen.
Bridgen’s appearance on the LotusEaters podcast is worth your time as useful reference point because he provides an overview of his science education and political background, speaks directly about the COVID-related issues he knows about, what he knows from the world of UK politics and more. As a Tory MP he was previously involved in exposing a UK government and police cover up of the prosecution of 39 subpostmasters who, due to UK Post Office software system failings, were wrongfully convicted for theft. After a ten year campaign, their convictions were overturned in 2021 and Bridgen now demands a government inquiry.
Once aware of the mischaracterised COVID gene therapy risk benefit profile for children, Bridgen crossed a line and made a speech in the House of Commons flagging gene therapy harms and death. He was subsequently cancelled, which tells you he is a threat.
While leading a debate in the House of Commons where every other politician save for the Speaker and 5 MPs on his side of the house (one of whom was Chris Chope MP) had deliberately left in unison, Bridgen expressly used the phrase “…Pfizer, Moderna or AstraZeneca experimental gene therapy treatments,” making him probably the only UK politician to ever publicly say that (certainly to VST’s knowledge). This was a critical watershed moment and metric because in order to decide to use that phrase he must have seen the credible supporting evidence in order to then actively decide to abandon the term “vaccine”. As of today’s appearance on LotusEaters, Bridgen is using “vaccine”, but he was willing to cross the line and VST will try to explore with him his attitudes to and choice of language should the opportunity arise.
He expressly states that UK politicians know and understand the real game and are hamstrung, scared, stuck and implicated in the second biggest scam on the planet, along with the media.
Bridgen knows and talks about more COVID issues than any other UK politician because his cancellation and exile from the Tories has let him off the leash. This, combined with his scientific literacy and COVID knowledge sets him apart from most, if not all other UK politicians. Judge for yourself as best you can via his appearance on LotusEaters
I was told, “there is currently no political appetite, Andrew, for your views on the vaccine. There may be in twenty years time and you’re probably going to be proved right. In the meantime you need to bear in mind that you’re taking on the most powerful vested interests in the world with all the personal risk that that entails.”
That was not the answer I was looking for.
This is some of why Bridgen needs to be supported and engaged. He is as good as it gets and he’s the only one. He might also be actually decent and capable. Fingers crossed. He now has nothing to lose and everything to gain by pursuing a strategy of political differentiation (self-imposed and externally enforced). He is the UK’s equivalent to Rand Paul & Ron Johnson, without the mainstream party membership. Until Bridgen loses his seat, he still has some influence, exposure, power and access. With the right support, he may be able to retain his seat and remain a thorn in the side of an utterly toxic and corrupt Uniparty system that installs the final pieces of neo-feudalism into the UK under the guise of an amateur panto where all the players slither and slide over a stage greased in human faeces.
Bridgen’s knowledge and fluidity is remarkable. He knows about the the Pfizer boutique clinical trial batch for 44,000 trial participants and the micro batch of the mass scale E. Coli for just 250 participants. He also knows that the E. Coli manufacturing process carries endotoxin risk driving anaphylaxis. That’s highly unusual for someone in his position and it is also a highly specialised, technical issue.
Bridgen represents something that has, until recently, been missing in the UK. He is the political conduit through which various anti-narrative groups can act inside Parliament. On his own terms, he is scientifically and data literate. He doesn’t need to be schooled on excess deaths, research and stats. He just needs to be fed, kept up to date and have the time and will to chew through the evidence in all its forms.
This is why the Australian legal case had to be flagged to Bridgen. It brings together fundamental and periphery issues in one place and Bridgen has the capability and knowledge to run with it. His political career should make him sufficiently capable with legal matters so that the viability of a UK case could be evaluated from his perspective in Parliament.
Whether you read VST from inside or outside the UK, please pay attention to Bridgen and help VST with upcoming requests for support in the UK and other political arenas.
The EU is likely the easiest place to attempt to legally port the Australian case because of the work Julian Gillespie has already done and the similarities in legislation and regulation. The UK should be similar, possibly the same, although it is trying to change away from the EU GMO regulatory model to make the UK a GMO free-for-all. But that’s the future, and we are still trying to prosecute our recent past.